Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesDG Systems & DM Issues Procedure For Import Through Personal Carriage

DG Systems & DM Issues Procedure For Import Through Personal Carriage

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Directorate General of Systems & Data Management (DG Systems & DM) under Central Board of Indirect Taxes And Customs (CBIC) has issued the procedure for import through Personal Carriage of items such as gems, jewellery, samples, and prototypes.

The enhanced system, outlined in Advisory No. 27/2025 dated May 9, 2025, enables importers and customs brokers to declare carried goods more transparently through the Indian Customs EDI System (ICES). This update follows CBIC’s earlier advisory issued on April 29, 2025, and is aimed at improving regulatory clarity and operational efficiency at ports of entry.

Categorical Declaration: Importers must declare whether the item is “GEMS”, “SAMPLE”, or “PROTOTYPE” using specific fields in the Single Window module at the item level of the Bill of Entry.

Mandatory Information: Additional mandatory fields include the passenger’s name, passport number, PNR, and e-ticket number.

Bonded Warehouse Option: Goods marked as “SAMPLE” or “PROTOTYPE” may either be examined at the port or transferred to a designated private bonded warehouse. This requires the importer to provide the warehouse code or specify ‘PORT’.

Transshipment Bond Requirement: For transporting items to bonded warehouses, a transshipment bond is now mandatory. The system will debit a value equivalent to the assessable value of the goods before permitting registration.

The move is expected to ease regulatory compliance while ensuring tighter control over the import of high-value hand-carried items. The advisory also provides procedural clarity to customs officers and guidance to stakeholders involved in the trade of precious commodities.

CBIC has encouraged stakeholders to reach out with queries via its dedicated emails—saksham.seva@icegate.gov.in for officer-related issues and icegate.helpdesk@icegate.gov.in for technical support.

Notification Details

Advisory No. 27/2025

Date: 09/05/2025

Read More: Allahabad High Court Disposes GST Petition After Clarification On Rs. 46 Lakh Credit Block, Not Debit

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...

Refund of Interest Paid on GST Liability Discharged Through ITC: GSTAT Restrains State Benches From Deciding Appeals

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has restrained...

More like this

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...