Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTAllahabad High Court Disposes GST Petition After Clarification On Rs. 46 Lakh...

Allahabad High Court Disposes GST Petition After Clarification On Rs. 46 Lakh Credit Block, Not Debit

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Allahabad High Court has disposed of the GST petition after clarification on Rs. 46 Lakh credit block and not debited.

The bench of Chief Justice Arun Bhansali and Justice Kshitij Shailendra has observed that the plea raised by the petitioner, essentially pertains to the debit entry having been made by the respondents, qua a sum of Rs. 46,01,645, which aspect has been clarified and indicated as having been blocked only, the apprehension as expressed by the petitioner and the foundation for filing the petition is taken care of.

The petitioner/assessee has challenged the action of the respondents in passing the order under Section 86A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

The petitioner contended that though the order passed under Section 86A of the Act, indicated blocking in the electronic credit register to the tune of Rs. 4,53,79,497, the GST department debited the amount to the tune of Rs. 46,01,645 in the electronic credit register of the petitioner and now an amount to the tune of Rs. 4,07,77,852 is being shown, as negative balance.

Though the plea in the petition pertains to the action of the respondents in negative blocking in the electronic credit register being contrary to the powers under Rule 86A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 a submission was made on 10.03.2025, by which the department was granted time to indicate as to whether the amount of Rs. 46,01,645, which was lying in the credit of the petitioner on the date of order, has been debited and/or the same has only been blocked or lien has been credited to which, instructions have been produced, inter alia, indicating that the amount of Rs. 46,01,645 has been blocked and not debited as claimed by the petitioner.

The court disposed of the writ petition. 

Case Details

Case Title: Dutt Metal Craft versus State of U.P. and another

Case No.: Writ Tax No. – 628 Of 2025

Date: 8.5.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Abhinav Gaur

Counsel For Respondent: C.S.C., Dhananjay Awasthi

Read More: Zero Tolerance For Corruption; CBI Can’t Be Rendered Helpless U/s S.17A PC Act: Delhi High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Negative Blocking of Electronic Credit Ledger Permissible for GST Recovery U/s 79: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that the GST authorities may resort to negative...

GST ITC Rejection on Property Constructed for Leasing Can’t Ignore Supreme Court’s Safari Retreats Ruling: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has set aside assessment orders rejecting input tax credit (ITC)...

CBIC Reviews JNCH Preparedness for 100% Non-Intrusive Inspection of Import Containers

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has reviewed the preparedness of...

WHEN WELFARE TAKES A BACK SEAT: INTERIM CHILD CUSTODY, COMITY AND STEREOTYPICAL NOTIONS OF MATRIMONY

The Article “WHEN WELFARE TAKES A BACK SEAT: INTERIM CHILD CUSTODY, COMITY AND STEREOTYPICAL...

More like this

Negative Blocking of Electronic Credit Ledger Permissible for GST Recovery U/s 79: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that the GST authorities may resort to negative...

GST ITC Rejection on Property Constructed for Leasing Can’t Ignore Supreme Court’s Safari Retreats Ruling: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has set aside assessment orders rejecting input tax credit (ITC)...

CBIC Reviews JNCH Preparedness for 100% Non-Intrusive Inspection of Import Containers

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has reviewed the preparedness of...