Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesCustoms Accused Can Be Shifted to Private Hospital During Remand if Medical...

Customs Accused Can Be Shifted to Private Hospital During Remand if Medical Condition Warrants: Telangana HC

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Telangana High Court has directed the Customs Department to shift a judicially remanded accused from Osmania General Hospital to KIMS Hospital, Hyderabad, for specialized medical treatment at his own expense, holding that the peculiar facts of the case and the petitioner’s deteriorating health warranted such relief. 

The bench of Justice J. Sreenivas Rao clarified that the transfer would be subject to proper police escort and continued security arrangements during hospitalization. 

The petitioner sought a direction to the investigating agency to shift him from Osmania General Hospital to KIMS Hospital for continuation of treatment during judicial remand until his bail application is decided. 

Buy Now: 70+ Judgements Indirect Tax – July 2026 | E-Magazine

The petitioner is an accused in HQ POR Nos. 13 and 14 of 2026 registered by the Superintendent of Customs (Preventive), Customs Commissionerate, Hyderabad, for alleged offences punishable under Sections 132 and 135 of the Customs Act, 1962. He was arrested on July 15, 2026, and remanded to judicial custody on the same day. The petitioner informed the Court that he was pursuing bail before the Special Court for Economic Offences, but the process was likely to take time. 

According to the petition, the accused suffered from serious medical ailments, including uncontrolled hypertension with blood pressure readings between 180 and 240, severe chest pain, breathing difficulties, and excessive sweating. Owing to his condition, he had been admitted to Osmania General Hospital for medical treatment. His cousin subsequently submitted a written representation to the Resident Medical Officer of Osmania General Hospital on July 28, 2026, requesting that he be shifted to KIMS Hospital for better medical care. 

Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the accused was willing to bear all expenses relating to his treatment at KIMS Hospital and would comply with any conditions imposed by the Court. It was argued that unless he was shifted to a better-equipped medical facility, he would suffer serious hardship. 

The Customs Department opposed the petition, contending that the Resident Medical Officer of Osmania General Hospital had not passed any order on the petitioner’s representation seeking transfer. It was further argued that the petitioner had failed to produce material demonstrating that Osmania General Hospital lacked the necessary medical infrastructure or facilities required for his treatment. 

The High Court noted that there was no dispute regarding the petitioner’s arrest, judicial custody, or the criminal proceedings under the Customs Act.

The Court also examined the medical records and the representation submitted by the petitioner’s cousin. These documents revealed that the petitioner had first been admitted to Osmania General Hospital on July 17, 2026, after suffering uncontrolled hypertension, continuous sweating, severe chest pain, and nausea. He was discharged on July 23, 2026. The records further disclosed that he was a cardiac patient who had been on Non-Invasive Ventilatory (NIV) support for the previous six months as part of his ongoing treatment. Subsequently, his health deteriorated again, leading to his re-admission on July 25, 2026, with severe chest pain. Doctors at Osmania General Hospital had advised consultation with a pulmonology specialist for further assessment and specialized management. 

The High Court observed that the petition specifically sought permission to shift the accused from Osmania General Hospital to KIMS Hospital for better treatment. Considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the petitioner’s medical condition as reflected in the pleadings and supporting medical records, the Court found it appropriate to permit the transfer. 

The Court emphasized that the petitioner himself had undertaken to bear all medical and attendant expenses and that adequate security arrangements could be maintained by the investigating agency during his hospitalization. 

Allowing the petition, the High Court directed the Investigating Officer to take necessary steps to shift the petitioner to KIMS Hospital, Hyderabad, under proper police escort for medical treatment.

The Court further directed that the petitioner shall bear the entire cost of his medical treatment and attendant expenses at KIMS Hospital. The Investigating Officer shall ensure adequate security arrangements throughout the petitioner’s stay at the hospital. 

The criminal petition stood disposed of, and all pending miscellaneous applications were also closed. 

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: Govt. Introduces Bill to Replace 125-Year-Old Bankers’ Books Evidence Law

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 16 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 16, 2026.GSTGST REVOCATION ORDER QUASHED AFTER...

CBIC Circulars Not Binding On GSTAT; Inverted Duty Refund Available Where Inputs And Finished Goods Are Distinct: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has upheld a refund...

Money Received by Intermediary Not Enough to Prove Public Servant Accepted Bribe: Supreme Court Acquits RPF Officer

The Supreme Court has acquitted a former Divisional Security Commissioner of the Railway Protection...

Loan Recovery Can’t Become “Instrument of Oppression”: Supreme Court Awards Rs.10 Lakh Compensation for Midnight Repossession of Truck

The Supreme Court has strongly deprecated the forcible repossession of a borrower’s truck by...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 16 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 16, 2026.GSTGST REVOCATION ORDER QUASHED AFTER...

CBIC Circulars Not Binding On GSTAT; Inverted Duty Refund Available Where Inputs And Finished Goods Are Distinct: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has upheld a refund...

Money Received by Intermediary Not Enough to Prove Public Servant Accepted Bribe: Supreme Court Acquits RPF Officer

The Supreme Court has acquitted a former Divisional Security Commissioner of the Railway Protection...