Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesCustoms Duty Evasion Worth Rs. 25.6 Crores By Undervaluing Walnut Imports |...

Customs Duty Evasion Worth Rs. 25.6 Crores By Undervaluing Walnut Imports | Surat Businessmen Under DRI’s Custody For 2 Days

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a major crackdown on customs duty evasion, the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) has arrested two Surat-based businessmen, Sachin and Pratik Kundaliya, for allegedly evading customs duties  worth Rs. 25.6 crore in the name of two different companies by undervaluing walnut imports. 

The duo reportedly manipulated invoices through UAE-based firms and routed payments via hawala channels to conceal the true value of their imports.

The DRI is now probing the full extent of their operations and possible involvement of other entities in the fraudulent scheme.

Read More: Delhi High Court Refuses To Interrupt In SCN Proceedings Against Accused Of Availing Fraudulent IGST Refund By Creating Fake Firms

Acting on specific intelligence, the agency conducted a search at Gayatri Exim, a Surat-based firm engaged in importing inshell walnuts (CTH 08023100) from Chile. Investigations revealed that the company had resorted to gross misdeclaration of value to evade duties.

During legal proceedings, Dr. Sujay Kantawala, the Counsel representing the accused, argued that his clients were innocent and unaware of any misdeclaration. The investigation is ongoing, with authorities looking into potential involvement of other entities in the scam.

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Interest Can’t Be Retained After Tax Refund On Delayed Export Receipts: Punjab & Haryana HC

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that the GST department cannot retain...

Central PSUs Must Route MSME Invoice Payments Through TReDS From October 15

The Central Government has notified October 15, 2026, as the commencement date for several...

Common Purchase Orders Do Not Prove Dummy Unit: CESTAT Quashes ₹69.86 Lakh Excise Demand

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has dismissed the...

Gujarat HC Quashes Rs. 43.43 crore GST Demand Against Amul

The Gujarat High Court has quashed a ₹43.43 crore GST demand against Amul, holding...

More like this

GST Interest Can’t Be Retained After Tax Refund On Delayed Export Receipts: Punjab & Haryana HC

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that the GST department cannot retain...

Central PSUs Must Route MSME Invoice Payments Through TReDS From October 15

The Central Government has notified October 15, 2026, as the commencement date for several...

Common Purchase Orders Do Not Prove Dummy Unit: CESTAT Quashes ₹69.86 Lakh Excise Demand

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has dismissed the...