Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesSupreme Court Upholds Rs. 50 Lakh Cost on Customs Dept. for Delay...

Supreme Court Upholds Rs. 50 Lakh Cost on Customs Dept. for Delay in Releasing Kiwi

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has upheld the order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court by which  Rs. 50 lakh cost was imposed on customs dept. for delay in releasing 89,420 kg of kiwi.

The bench of Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan heard Advocate Sourabh Kapoor who represented importer and dismissed the Special Leave Petition filed by the Customs Department challenging the order directing the department to pay the importer compensation calculated conservatively of Rs. 50 lakhs as the Kiwi worth weighing 89,420 kilograms were destroyed on account of delay in release by the respondents. 

The case arose when the petitioner, engaged in importing food items, brought four containers of kiwi from R.A. Logistics & Distribution LLC, Dubai, destined for ICD Ludhiana. Despite repeated requests to file a manual bill of entry under Section 46 of the Customs Act, citing the fruit’s short shelf life, customs authorities refused. The Import General Manifest (IGM) amendment was also denied, resulting in the fruit perishing in storage.

The court found that customs had the statutory power under Section 30(3) to amend the IGM but failed to act. Since the goods had been destroyed, retaining import duty would amount to unjust enrichment, the bench observed.

Case Details

Case Title: UNION OF INDIA & ORS. VERSUS M/S PRENDA CREATIONS PVT LTD & ANR. 

Case No.: Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19780/2025

Date:  08-08-2025

Counsel For  Petitioner: N.venkataraman, A.S.G.

Counsel For Respondent:  Sourabh Kapoor, Adv.

Read More: Vivek Kumar Appointed Technical Member (State) of GSTAT Uttar Pradesh Bench: Know Him

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No GST on Assignment of GIDC Leasehold Rights: Gujarat High Court Orders Refund of ITC Reversal With Interest

The Gujarat High Court has held that the assignment of leasehold rights in an...

NCLT Can’t Involve ED or CBI in Company Investigation Without Hearing Affected Parties: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the National Company Law...

Personal Customs Penalty Proceedings Against Company Director Abate After His Death: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has declared that customs penalty proceedings initiated against a company...

GST Order Passed Without Hearing Quashed: Madras High Court 

The Madras High Court has set aside a GST assessment order passed under Section...

More like this

No GST on Assignment of GIDC Leasehold Rights: Gujarat High Court Orders Refund of ITC Reversal With Interest

The Gujarat High Court has held that the assignment of leasehold rights in an...

NCLT Can’t Involve ED or CBI in Company Investigation Without Hearing Affected Parties: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the National Company Law...

Personal Customs Penalty Proceedings Against Company Director Abate After His Death: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has declared that customs penalty proceedings initiated against a company...