HomeIndirect TaxesClandestine Removal Cannot Be Alleged Without Concrete Evidence: CESTAT

Clandestine Removal Cannot Be Alleged Without Concrete Evidence: CESTAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal cannot be sustained merely on assumptions, private records, or uncorroborated statements, setting aside a central excise demand of over ₹3.03 crore along with penalties. The bench of Ashok Jindal (Judicial Member) and K.Anpazhakan…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Jurishour | Tax Law Daily Bulletin : April 17, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for April 17, 2026.GSTEXPLANATION CAN’T BE APPLIED RETROSPECTIVELY:...

Use of Word ‘Can’ in Arbitration Clause Not Mandatory: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that the use of the word “can” in an...

Supreme Court Upholds Limited Regularisation but Strikes Down Blanket Future Policy for Ad Hoc Employees

The Supreme Court of India has delivered a nuanced judgment on the contentious issue...

More like this

Jurishour | Tax Law Daily Bulletin : April 17, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for April 17, 2026.GSTEXPLANATION CAN’T BE APPLIED RETROSPECTIVELY:...

Use of Word ‘Can’ in Arbitration Clause Not Mandatory: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that the use of the word “can” in an...