Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesClandestine Removal Cannot Be Alleged Without Concrete Evidence: CESTAT

Clandestine Removal Cannot Be Alleged Without Concrete Evidence: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
cestat

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal cannot be sustained merely on assumptions, private records, or uncorroborated statements, setting aside a central excise demand of over ₹3.03 crore along with penalties. The bench of Ashok Jindal (Judicial Member) and K.Anpazhakan…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court

Fraudulent Revenue Entries Can’t Confer Title: Supreme Court Upholds Telangana’s Ownership Of 550 Acres In Miyapur

The Supreme Court has upheld Telangana’s ownership of 550 acres and 39 guntas in...
Notification

GST e-Invoice Data Services To Face 28-Hour Downtime From October 31; GSTR-1 Auto-Population Affected

Certain e-Invoice-related services on the GST portal will remain temporarily unavailable for 28 hours,...
Supreme Court

Supreme Court Transfers Rival Trademark Suits From Delhi And Indore To Ahmedabad For Trial Before One Court

The Supreme Court has transferred two competing commercial suits concerning trademark infringement from the...
Supreme Court

No Automatic Bail For Arrest-Grounds Service Defect Without Prejudice: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has cancelled bail granted to an accused in an alleged espionage...

More like this

Supreme Court

Fraudulent Revenue Entries Can’t Confer Title: Supreme Court Upholds Telangana’s Ownership Of 550 Acres In Miyapur

The Supreme Court has upheld Telangana’s ownership of 550 acres and 39 guntas in...
Notification

GST e-Invoice Data Services To Face 28-Hour Downtime From October 31; GSTR-1 Auto-Population Affected

Certain e-Invoice-related services on the GST portal will remain temporarily unavailable for 28 hours,...
Supreme Court

Supreme Court Transfers Rival Trademark Suits From Delhi And Indore To Ahmedabad For Trial Before One Court

The Supreme Court has transferred two competing commercial suits concerning trademark infringement from the...