HomeIndirect TaxesClandestine Removal Cannot Be Alleged Without Concrete Evidence: CESTAT

Clandestine Removal Cannot Be Alleged Without Concrete Evidence: CESTAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal cannot be sustained merely on assumptions, private records, or uncorroborated statements, setting aside a central excise demand of over ₹3.03 crore along with penalties. The bench of Ashok Jindal (Judicial Member) and K.Anpazhakan…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Human Error in E-Way Bill Can’t Trigger GST Detention Penalty U/s 129: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a mere human or typographical error in...

Whether Airline Can Be Saddled with IGST Liability Without Being ‘Recipient’ of CRS Services? Bombay HC Grants Interim Relief

The Bombay High Court has agreed to examine a significant Goods and Services Tax...

CBI Wildlife Trafficking Case: Mumbai Court Grants Bail Citing Lack of Specific Possession Allegations

The Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 3rd Court, Esplanade, Mumbai, has granted...

Parliamentary Panel Urged to Fill 1,588 Vacant Assistant/Deputy Commissioner Posts in CBIC; SC/ST Association Flags Delay in Reservation Implementation

The All India Income Tax SC/ST Employees Welfare Federation (ITSEWA) has urged the Parliamentary...

More like this

Human Error in E-Way Bill Can’t Trigger GST Detention Penalty U/s 129: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a mere human or typographical error in...

Whether Airline Can Be Saddled with IGST Liability Without Being ‘Recipient’ of CRS Services? Bombay HC Grants Interim Relief

The Bombay High Court has agreed to examine a significant Goods and Services Tax...

CBI Wildlife Trafficking Case: Mumbai Court Grants Bail Citing Lack of Specific Possession Allegations

The Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 3rd Court, Esplanade, Mumbai, has granted...