Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesMere Violation of CHALR Can’t Justify Penalty Against Customs Broker Without Proving...

Mere Violation of CHALR Can’t Justify Penalty Against Customs Broker Without Proving Illegal Import: CESTAT 

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Mere Violation of CHALR Can’t Justify Penalty Against Customs Broker Without Proving Illegal Import: CESTAT 

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that breach of Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations (CHALR), 2004, by itself, cannot sustain penalty under Section 112(a)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 in the absence of specific allegations and proof of involvement in illegal import. The Bench comprising Justice…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court

Cheque Bounce Notice Received By Mother At Correct Address Presumed Served: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a statutory demand notice in a cheque dishonour...
Supreme Court

SARFAESI Auction Can’t Override Mandatory Safeguards: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a confirmed auction sale under the SARFAESI Act...
Supreme Court

Disputed Dues Can’t Be Recovered From Separate Contracts Without Legal Authority: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has set aside a recovery of ₹84.17 lakh from a contractor’s...
Direct Tax

JAO vs FAO Reassessment Dispute: Telangana, Madras HC Reserve Verdicts on S. 147A

The Telangana and Madras High Courts have reportedly reserved their verdicts in matters concerning...

More like this

Supreme Court

Cheque Bounce Notice Received By Mother At Correct Address Presumed Served: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a statutory demand notice in a cheque dishonour...
Supreme Court

SARFAESI Auction Can’t Override Mandatory Safeguards: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a confirmed auction sale under the SARFAESI Act...
Supreme Court

Disputed Dues Can’t Be Recovered From Separate Contracts Without Legal Authority: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has set aside a recovery of ₹84.17 lakh from a contractor’s...