Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxIncome Tax Dept Attaches Rs. 100 Crore Land in Telangana in Alleged...

Income Tax Dept Attaches Rs. 100 Crore Land in Telangana in Alleged Benami Deal

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Income Tax Department’s Benami Prohibition Unit has provisionally attached 2.2 acres of high-value land in Narsingi village of Rangareddy district, Telangana, estimating its market worth at nearly ₹100 crore. The property is alleged to be a benami asset held in the name of Gia Global Consultants Pvt Ltd.

According to the provisional attachment order, the land was purchased by Gia Global through a sale deed dated October 16, 2023, for a declared consideration of ₹8.5 crore, along with stamp duty and registration charges of ₹64 lakh. However, investigations revealed significant discrepancies in the transaction.

The department found that Gia Global had a paid-up capital of just ₹10 lakh and reported no income. Further scrutiny showed no credible banking trail to support the high-value purchase. While the sale deed indicated payment via cheque from a State Bank of India account, verification revealed no corresponding debit entries. In fact, the total debits from the account during the relevant period were only around ₹9.1 lakh.

Gia Global was incorporated on August 11, 2023, and opened its bank account on October 12, 2023—just four days before the land transaction. Officials concluded that the company lacked the financial capacity and creditworthiness to undertake such a purchase.

Statements recorded during the investigation further strengthened the department’s case. On February 18 and 19, 2026, director Koneru Murali Krishna admitted under oath that the company had not paid the sale consideration. Similarly, on March 6, 2026, Pajjuri Karunakar, representing the seller Industrial Oil Purification Pvt Ltd, confirmed that no payment had been received.

Based on these findings, authorities concluded that although the sale deed recorded a transaction, the funds were neither paid by the purchaser nor received by the seller. Instead, the deal is suspected to have been financed by an unidentified or untraceable third party for their own benefit.

The transaction has been classified as benami under Section 2(9)(D) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988. Gia Global has been identified as the ‘benamidar’, allegedly holding the property on behalf of an undisclosed beneficial owner.

The order also highlighted a stark undervaluation. While the registered value of the land stood at ₹8.5 crore, its estimated market value was pegged at around ₹100 crore, based on government auction rates for similar properties in the area.

A show-cause notice was issued to the company on April 2, 2026, followed by the provisional attachment order on April 23, 2026. The department stated that the attachment was necessary to prevent any sale, transfer, or disposal of the property while proceedings under the Benami law are ongoing.

Additionally, the order referenced the seller’s past legal issues, noting that Industrial Oil Purification Pvt Ltd had previously been fined ₹5 lakh by the Telangana High Court for illegal alterations of land records in the same region.

Read More: No Service Tax Under Works Contract If Tax Paid on Service Portion After Availing Notification 12/2003-ST: CESTAT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 16 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 16, 2026.GSTGST REVOCATION ORDER QUASHED AFTER...

CBIC Circulars Not Binding On GSTAT; Inverted Duty Refund Available Where Inputs And Finished Goods Are Distinct: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has upheld a refund...

Money Received by Intermediary Not Enough to Prove Public Servant Accepted Bribe: Supreme Court Acquits RPF Officer

The Supreme Court has acquitted a former Divisional Security Commissioner of the Railway Protection...

Loan Recovery Can’t Become “Instrument of Oppression”: Supreme Court Awards Rs.10 Lakh Compensation for Midnight Repossession of Truck

The Supreme Court has strongly deprecated the forcible repossession of a borrower’s truck by...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 16 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 16, 2026.GSTGST REVOCATION ORDER QUASHED AFTER...

CBIC Circulars Not Binding On GSTAT; Inverted Duty Refund Available Where Inputs And Finished Goods Are Distinct: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has upheld a refund...

Money Received by Intermediary Not Enough to Prove Public Servant Accepted Bribe: Supreme Court Acquits RPF Officer

The Supreme Court has acquitted a former Divisional Security Commissioner of the Railway Protection...