Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesCar Seat Mechanisms Classifiable as ‘Parts of Seats’: CESTAT Slams Commissioner for...

Car Seat Mechanisms Classifiable as ‘Parts of Seats’: CESTAT Slams Commissioner for Breach of Judicial Discipline

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Car Seat Mechanisms Classifiable as ‘Parts of Seats’: CESTAT Slams Commissioner for Breach of Judicial Discipline

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi Principal Bench, has set aside a customs duty demand and penalty holding that imported seat mechanisms such as track assemblies and adjusters are classifiable as “parts of seats” and not as “parts and accessories of motor vehicles.” The bench of Justice Dilip Gupta (President) and…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court

Criminal Breach Of Trust Can’t Be Proved Without Evidence Of Entrustment And Dishonest Intent: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has restored the acquittal of a former Telephone Department cashier accused...
Direct Tax

Investors Not Named in Trust Deed: Supreme Court Rejects CBDT Appeal Against Tax Relief 

The Supreme Court has dismissed the Central Board of Direct Taxes’ (CBDT) challenge to...
Columns

India’s $112 Billion Trade Gap With China Exposes Manufacturing Dependence

India’s success in reducing toy imports has shown how targeted customs duties and quality...
GST

Disputed GST Hearing Notice Must Be Examined in Appeal; Writ Relief Declined Despite Gaps in 100% Penalty Order: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has declined to interfere with an ex parte GST adjudication...

More like this

Supreme Court

Criminal Breach Of Trust Can’t Be Proved Without Evidence Of Entrustment And Dishonest Intent: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has restored the acquittal of a former Telephone Department cashier accused...
Direct Tax

Investors Not Named in Trust Deed: Supreme Court Rejects CBDT Appeal Against Tax Relief 

The Supreme Court has dismissed the Central Board of Direct Taxes’ (CBDT) challenge to...
Columns

India’s $112 Billion Trade Gap With China Exposes Manufacturing Dependence

India’s success in reducing toy imports has shown how targeted customs duties and quality...