Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTVisakhapatnam DGGI Arrests Key Operator in Rs. 9.62 Crore Fake ITC Racket 

Visakhapatnam DGGI Arrests Key Operator in Rs. 9.62 Crore Fake ITC Racket 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), Visakhapatnam Zonal Unit, has arrested T. Venkata Swaroop Kumar, identified as a key operator behind a fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) network involving multiple controlled entities. This marks the first arrest by the Visakhapatnam Zonal Unit in the financial year 2026–27.

According to officials, the accused orchestrated a sophisticated racket by floating and managing several firms that were projected as legitimate providers of works contract services. However, investigations revealed that these entities were merely shell or dummy firms with no actual capacity to undertake the scale of projects reflected in their invoices. These firms were instead used as conduits for fraudulent availment and distribution of ITC.

The latest arrest follows two earlier apprehensions in the same case. Mallikarjuna Manoj Kumar, alleged to be another key mastermind, and D.N. Srinivasa Reddy, a partner in Sri Progressive Projects—the principal beneficiary firm—had previously been taken into custody.

Preliminary findings indicate that the network of firms controlled by the accused fraudulently availed ITC amounting to ₹9.62 crore. Out of this, fraudulent credit worth ₹7.49 crore was passed on to Sri Progressive Projects. Authorities noted that the transactions lacked any genuine business activity and were supported by invoices that did not correspond to actual supply of services.

A detailed financial probe uncovered a pattern of systematic layering and circular routing of funds through interconnected entities. This movement of money across controlled firms pointed to a well-planned scheme designed to evade GST and unlawfully avail tax benefits.

Officials stated that the accused has committed offences punishable under Sections 132(1)(b) and 132(1)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017, which deal with fraudulent availment and utilisation of ITC. These offences are classified as cognizable and non-bailable under Section 132(5) of the Act. The arrest was carried out following due approval from the competent authority under Section 69(1) of the CGST Act, 2017.

The investigation is ongoing, and further arrests and recovery proceedings are expected as authorities continue to unravel the full extent of the racket.

Read More: Supreme Court Upholds Prosecution of Police Officers, Clarifies Limits of Sanction Protection Under CrPC

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

‘On-Money’ Addition Deleted As Third-Party Excel Sheet Failed To Establish Undisclosed Payment: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted an addition of ₹2.5 crore...

2 Flats Merged Into 1 Home Qualify For Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has upheld capital gains exemptions totalling ₹28.45...

Dealer Incentives Can’t Be Taxed Merely on Ledger Entries: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...

Customs Interest Can’t Be Backdated Before Confiscation Liability Is Determined; Nearly 8 Year Period Excluded: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that interest arising from customs confiscation and redemption...

More like this

‘On-Money’ Addition Deleted As Third-Party Excel Sheet Failed To Establish Undisclosed Payment: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted an addition of ₹2.5 crore...

2 Flats Merged Into 1 Home Qualify For Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has upheld capital gains exemptions totalling ₹28.45...

Dealer Incentives Can’t Be Taxed Merely on Ledger Entries: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...