The Allahabad High Court has raised serious concerns over coercive recovery proceedings initiated by State GST authorities in cases where the statutory remedy of a second appeal before the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) is unavailable due to the Tribunal not being constituted or made functional. The bench of Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Justice Vivek…
SGST Dept. Can’t Initiate Coercive Recovery Proceedings When GSTAT Is Non-Functional: Allahabad HC
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.
Latest articles
GST
Parallel GST Proceedings Not Barred Where Different Years & Distinct Allegations Involved: Delhi HC
The Delhi High Court has held that proceedings initiated under separate provisions for different...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation for Prosthetic Limbs in Motor Accident Cases; Enhances Award to ₹36.20 Lakh
The Supreme Court has laid down an important framework governing compensation for prosthetic limbs...
Supreme Court
Cause of Action Must Be Judged Without Conducting Mini-Trial Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Supreme Court Quashes Rejection of Plaint Order
The Supreme Court of India has set aside the Madras High Court’s order rejecting...
Direct Tax
No “Make Available” of Technical Knowledge: Supreme Court Upholds Non-Taxability of Receipts Under India–US DTAA
The Supreme Court of India has dismissed a Special Leave Petition filed by the...
More like this
GST
Parallel GST Proceedings Not Barred Where Different Years & Distinct Allegations Involved: Delhi HC
The Delhi High Court has held that proceedings initiated under separate provisions for different...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation for Prosthetic Limbs in Motor Accident Cases; Enhances Award to ₹36.20 Lakh
The Supreme Court has laid down an important framework governing compensation for prosthetic limbs...
Supreme Court
Cause of Action Must Be Judged Without Conducting Mini-Trial Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Supreme Court Quashes Rejection of Plaint Order
The Supreme Court of India has set aside the Madras High Court’s order rejecting...

