Ask Jurishour AI

HomeGSTSGST Dept. Can’t Initiate Coercive Recovery Proceedings When GSTAT Is Non-Functional: Allahabad...

SGST Dept. Can’t Initiate Coercive Recovery Proceedings When GSTAT Is Non-Functional: Allahabad HC 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Allahabad High Court has raised serious concerns over coercive recovery proceedings initiated by State GST authorities in cases where the statutory remedy of a second appeal before the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) is unavailable due to the Tribunal not being constituted or made functional.  The bench of Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Justice Vivek…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GSTAT Admits Appeal Challenging Clubbing of 6 FY in Single S. 74 GST Notice

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has admitted an appeal raising significant...

AO Can’t Reject DCF Valuation by Comparing Projections With Actual Results: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench “B”, has held that an Assessing...

Later Supreme Court Ruling Can’t Validate Earlier S. 143(1) Adjustment on Debatable PF/ESI Issue: ITAT

The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that employees’...

GST Demand Can’t Be Confirmed Under Valuation Rule Different From One Invoked in SCN : Gujarat High Court 

The Gujarat High Court has quashed a GST show cause notice and consequential adjudication...

More like this

GSTAT Admits Appeal Challenging Clubbing of 6 FY in Single S. 74 GST Notice

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has admitted an appeal raising significant...

AO Can’t Reject DCF Valuation by Comparing Projections With Actual Results: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench “B”, has held that an Assessing...

Later Supreme Court Ruling Can’t Validate Earlier S. 143(1) Adjustment on Debatable PF/ESI Issue: ITAT

The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that employees’...