SC Directs Torrent Power to Deposit Rs. 19.28 Crore GST Refund

HomeGSTRefund Not Payable to Assessee When Tax Incidence Passed On To Consumers:...

Refund Not Payable to Assessee When Tax Incidence Passed On To Consumers: Supreme Court Directs Torrent Power to Deposit Rs. 19.28 Crore

GST Supreme Court Top Stories

Published on

12/02/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Refund Not Payable to Assessee When Tax Incidence Passed On To Consumers: Supreme Court Directs Torrent Power to Deposit Rs. 19.28 Crore

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has set aside the Gujarat High Court’s judgment that had permitted Torrent Power Ltd. to retain a refund of Rs. 19.28 crore in a designated account for eventual adjustment in consumer tariffs and directed that the entire refund amount be transferred to the Consumer Welfare Fund under Section 57 of the Central…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Refund Not Payable to Assessee When Tax Incidence Passed On To Consumers: Supreme Court Directs Torrent Power to Deposit Rs. 19.28 Crore

Membership Required

Latest articles

Seat of Arbitration Alone Determines Jurisdiction, Not Place of Hearing or Award: Supreme Court

Discharge by Criminal Court Bars Subsequent Administrative Action: Supreme Court Quashes Air Force Officer’s Dismissal

Bank Liable for Letting Cheques Turn Stale, Supreme Court Cuts Compensation to 6%

Bank Deposits Can’t Be Treated as Unexplained Income When Linked to Business Turnover; Profit Estimation Must Follow Past History: ITAT

More like this

Seat of Arbitration Alone Determines Jurisdiction, Not Place of Hearing or Award: Supreme Court

Discharge by Criminal Court Bars Subsequent Administrative Action: Supreme Court Quashes Air Force Officer’s Dismissal

Bank Liable for Letting Cheques Turn Stale, Supreme Court Cuts Compensation to 6%

About us

Company

Categories