SC Directs Torrent Power to Deposit Rs. 19.28 Crore GST Refund

HomeGSTRefund Not Payable to Assessee When Tax Incidence Passed On To Consumers:...

Refund Not Payable to Assessee When Tax Incidence Passed On To Consumers: Supreme Court Directs Torrent Power to Deposit Rs. 19.28 Crore

GST Supreme Court

Published on

12/02/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Refund Not Payable to Assessee When Tax Incidence Passed On To Consumers: Supreme Court Directs Torrent Power to Deposit Rs. 19.28 Crore

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has set aside the Gujarat High Court’s judgment that had permitted Torrent Power Ltd. to retain a refund of Rs. 19.28 crore in a designated account for eventual adjustment in consumer tariffs and directed that the entire refund amount be transferred to the Consumer Welfare Fund under Section 57 of the Central…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Refund Not Payable to Assessee When Tax Incidence Passed On To Consumers: Supreme Court Directs Torrent Power to Deposit Rs. 19.28 Crore

Membership Required

Latest articles

Penalty for Abetment Can’t Survive After Main Customs Misdeclaration Case Fails: CESTAT

CBIC Can’t Treat IRS Officer’s Personal Family Disputes as Official Misconduct: Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 25K Cost on Erring Officer for Delaying Litigation

10% GST Penalty Pre-Deposit Rule Not Applicable Where SCN Issued Before 1 October 2025: Delhi High Court

Rajasthan HC Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Exemplary Costs on CBIC For Vindictive Suspension of IRS Officer

More like this

Penalty for Abetment Can’t Survive After Main Customs Misdeclaration Case Fails: CESTAT

CBIC Can’t Treat IRS Officer’s Personal Family Disputes as Official Misconduct: Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 25K Cost on Erring Officer for Delaying Litigation

10% GST Penalty Pre-Deposit Rule Not Applicable Where SCN Issued Before 1 October 2025: Delhi High Court

About us

Company

Categories