Physical Surrender Not Mandatory Where Accused Regularly Appeared Before Trial Court: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused in GST Fake Invoice

HomeGSTPhysical Surrender Not Mandatory Where Accused Regularly Appeared Before Trial Court: Supreme...

Physical Surrender Not Mandatory Where Accused Regularly Appeared Before Trial Court: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused in GST Fake Invoice

GST Top Stories

Published on

14/01/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has granted regular bail to four accused persons booked under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, holding that no meaningful purpose would be served by directing their incarceration merely because they had not physically surrendered after withdrawal of COVID-era interim bail. The Court emphasised that consistent appearances before the trial…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Physical Surrender

Physical Surrender Not Mandatory Where Accused Regularly Appeared Before Trial Court: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused in GST Fake Invoice

Membership Required

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 May, 2026

Movement of Goods to Depots for Inventory Replenishment Can’t Be Treated as Inter-State Sale: CESTAT

Customs Broker Can’t Be Penalised for Export of Ergotamine Preparation; S. 117 Not Invocable Where Specific Penalty Provision Exists: CESTAT

Dept. Appeal Doesn’t Automatically Stay Appellate Order; GST Registration Restoration Directions Must Be Followed Without Specific Stay: Allahabad HC

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 May, 2026

Movement of Goods to Depots for Inventory Replenishment Can’t Be Treated as Inter-State Sale: CESTAT

Customs Broker Can’t Be Penalised for Export of Ergotamine Preparation; S. 117 Not Invocable Where Specific Penalty Provision Exists: CESTAT

About us

Company

Categories