Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTPenalty U/s 125 GST Act Can’t Be More Than Rs. 25K: Allahabad...

Penalty U/s 125 GST Act Can’t Be More Than Rs. 25K: Allahabad High Court Quashes Order Imposing Rs. 50K

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Allahabad High Court has quashed the order imposing a penalty of Rs. 50K under Section 125 GST Act.

The bench of Justice Pankaj Bhatia has observed that no opportunity of hearing has been granted or is reflected in the order, the order was quashed. The matter was remanded to the authority concerned to pass a fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing in accordance with law.

The petitioner has challenged an order by which an amount of Rs.50,000 has been imposed under section 125 of the GST Act.

Section 125 of the CGST/SGST Act provides that any person who contravenes any provision of the Act or the rules made under this Act for which no separate penalty has been prescribed shall be punishable with a penalty that may extend to Rs. 25,000.

The petitioner has submitted that a penalty of Rs.50,000 has been imposed under section 125 GST Act without even giving an opportunity of hearing. In terms of Section 125 also, a maximum penalty imposable is Rs.25000 and the order is mechanical in imposing the penalty, which is also contrary to the mandate of Section 125 of the GST.

The court allowed the petition and ruled in favour of the assessee.

Case Details

Case Title: M/S Sriram Traders  Versus State Of U.P.

Case No.: Writ Tax No. – 327 Of 2025

Date: 11.4.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Savitra Vardhan Singh

Counsel For Respondent: C.S.C

Read More: Bombay High Court Upholds Disallowance of Interest Paid to Beneficiaries, Rules Trust as Association Of Persons

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 10 OCTOBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for October 10, 2026.GSTGST APPEAL DEADLINE DOESN’T START...

Rs. 1 Crore Tax Refund Denied: Firm’s Payment Of Partner’s Dues Held Voluntary, Change In Constitution Not Disclosed: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a partnership firm’s plea for refund of ₹1...

₹65.52 Lakh Tax Deduction Can’t Be Denied Merely For Wrong Income Column In Return: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has held that a co-operative society’s deduction...

Income Tax Appeal Dismissed Without Merits Decision Restored Despite Repeated Non-Compliance: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has restored an income...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 10 OCTOBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for October 10, 2026.GSTGST APPEAL DEADLINE DOESN’T START...

Rs. 1 Crore Tax Refund Denied: Firm’s Payment Of Partner’s Dues Held Voluntary, Change In Constitution Not Disclosed: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a partnership firm’s plea for refund of ₹1...

₹65.52 Lakh Tax Deduction Can’t Be Denied Merely For Wrong Income Column In Return: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has held that a co-operative society’s deduction...