Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTPaper Bags Attracts 18% GST, Not 5% Concessional Rate: AAR

Paper Bags Attracts 18% GST, Not 5% Concessional Rate: AAR

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (GAAR) has ruled that paper bags falling under HSN 48194000 are liable to 18% Goods and Services Tax (GST) and cannot claim the benefit of the concessional 5% GST rate available to certain paper sacks and bags under the amended GST rate notification.

The bench of Vishal Malani and Sushma Vora has observed that  the description under Entry 185 expressly provides that all goods of Heading 4819, other than specified cartons, boxes and cases, are taxable at 18%. This demonstrates the legislative intent to extend the concessional rate only to specifically identified products while retaining the standard rate for other packing containers such as sacks and bags. 

The advance ruling application was filed by a Gujarat-based manufacturer engaged in producing paper bags used for packaging and carrying goods. The company sought clarity on whether its products qualified for the reduced GST rate introduced through Notification No. 09/2025-Central Tax (Rate) following the recommendations of the 54th GST Council meeting. 

According to the applicant, its products are manufactured by cutting, printing, folding and pasting paper sheets into finished paper bags meant for packaging various goods. The company stated that these bags are classifiable under Tariff Item 48194000, which specifically covers “sacks and bags, including cones, of paper, paperboard, cellulose wadding or webs of cellulose fibres.” 

The applicant contended that despite the insertion of Entry 319 in Schedule I, the specific classification of paper bags under Heading 4819 continued to govern their tax treatment. It argued that the newly introduced entry was a general provision and therefore could not override the specific classification applicable to goods under Heading 4819. 

During the proceedings, the Authority examined the relevant provisions of the Customs Tariff Act, the applicable chapter notes and the GST rate notifications. It observed that Entry 185 of Schedule II specifically covers all goods falling under Heading 4819, except goods classified under tariff items 481910 and 481920. Since paper bags under HSN 48194000 are not among the excluded tariff items, they continue to remain within the scope of Entry 185 attracting GST at 18%. 

Rejecting the applicability of Entry 319, the Authority held that the entry is of a broader and more general nature and cannot supersede a specific tariff entry. Referring to the settled principle of classification that a specific entry prevails over a general entry, the Authority concluded that goods specifically falling under HSN 48194000 must continue to be classified under Entry 185 of Schedule II. 

Accordingly, the Gujarat AAR ruled that paper bags classifiable under HSN 48194000 attract GST at the rate of 18%, and are not eligible for the concessional 5% GST available under Entry 319 of Schedule I of Notification No. 01/2017-Central Tax (Rate), as amended by Notification No. 09/2025-Central Tax (Rate). The ruling reinforces the principle that specific tariff classifications take precedence over general descriptions while determining GST liability.

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: GST Proceedings Against Non-Existent Amalgamated Company Void: Bombay High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GSTAT Dismisses Dept. Appeal Over Rs. 7.35 Lakh Interest Demand as Below Rs. 20 Lakh Monetary Limit

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has dismissed a Revenue...

GST Refund Can’t Be Denied by Questioning ITC Eligibility Without S. 73 or 74 Proceedings: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has held that a...

Education Provider Need Not Be University to Claim Service Tax Exemption for Recognised Degree Courses: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Subsequent Deposit of Full 10% Meets Mandatory Pre-Deposit Requirement: CESTAT

The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)...

More like this

GSTAT Dismisses Dept. Appeal Over Rs. 7.35 Lakh Interest Demand as Below Rs. 20 Lakh Monetary Limit

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has dismissed a Revenue...

GST Refund Can’t Be Denied by Questioning ITC Eligibility Without S. 73 or 74 Proceedings: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has held that a...

Education Provider Need Not Be University to Claim Service Tax Exemption for Recognised Degree Courses: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...