HomeGSTOrissa High Court Stays 10% Pre-Deposit Demand On Remaining Disputed Tax Under...

Orissa High Court Stays 10% Pre-Deposit Demand On Remaining Disputed Tax Under GST

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Orissa High Court has stayed 10% pre-deposit demand on remaining disputed tax under GST.

The bench of Acting Chief Justice Arindam Sinha and Justice M.S. Sahoo has observed that there was a notification dated 16th August, 2024 made by Central revenue reducing the deposit to 10%. Now, State revenue has correspondingly notified on 29th October, 2024. In the circumstances, the writ petition be disposed of as covered by order dated 16th February, 2024 with modification for deposit of 10% of remaining disputed tax for order to remain stayed.

The appellant/assessee has challenged the order made by the First Appellate Authority. The assessees and the department were complying with directions made on order dated 16th February, 2024 by the First Division Bench in a batch of writ petitions, lead case being WP(C) no.42015 of 2023 (M/s. Maa Tarini Traders v. State of Odisha and others).

The directions included requiring the assessee to deposit 10% of the disputed amount of tax on filing the appeal and further 20% of remaining disputed tax, for the impugned order to be stayed.

The court accepted submission on behalf of petitioner regarding corresponding notification reducing requirement of the deposit to 10% of disputed tax for first appellate order to remain stayed. 

Case Details

Case Title: Boddapati Rama Versus Joint Commissioner of State Tax

Case No.: W.P.(C) No.4890 of 2025

Date: 20.02.2025

Counsel For Appellant: Itishree Tripathy

Counsel For Respondent: D. Das

Read More: ‘Intellectual Property’ Right Not A Provision For Incentivizing Innovation, CESTAT Remands Back To Decide Refund Of Accumulated CENVAT Credit 

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : APRIL 29, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for APRIL 29, 2026.GSTGST Not Leviable on Affiliation...

Service Tenure Can Be Curtailed Without It Being Punitive If Order Is Non-Stigmatic: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has upheld the curtailment of tenure of a senior अधिकारी, holding...

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 33.78 Crore Excise Demand on Home Appliances, Rules Extended Limitation Not Invocable

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside...

No Writ in GST Refund Rejection; Assessee Must Approach GSTAT: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has refused to interfere in a GST refund dispute filed...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : APRIL 29, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for APRIL 29, 2026.GSTGST Not Leviable on Affiliation...

Service Tenure Can Be Curtailed Without It Being Punitive If Order Is Non-Stigmatic: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has upheld the curtailment of tenure of a senior अधिकारी, holding...

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 33.78 Crore Excise Demand on Home Appliances, Rules Extended Limitation Not Invocable

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside...