HomeGSTMadras High Court Quashes Order Passed Against Non-Existent Entity Post-Amalgamation Despite Prior...

Madras High Court Quashes Order Passed Against Non-Existent Entity Post-Amalgamation Despite Prior Intimation

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madras High Court has quashed the order passed against non-existent entity post-amalgamation despite prior intimation.

The bench of Justice Mohammed Shaffiq has observed that it is not permissible for the department to issue a show cause notice in the name of a company which stood amalgamated and proceed to complete the adjudication, in the name of the amalgamated/non-existent company.

The petitioner/assessee, Larsen and Toubro Limited has raised the issue whether it is permissible for the respondent authority to issue a show cause notice in the name of a company which stood amalgamated and proceed to complete the adjudication, in the name of the amalgamated/non-existent company.

The department  submitted that the respondent authority was not aware of the amalgamation. When the show cause notice was pointed, to state that the officer was informed and aware of the factum of amalgamation, the learned counsel for respondent would request liberty to proceed afresh against the resultant company.

The court quashed the proceedings against the amalgamated entity.

Case Details

Case Title: M/s.Larsen and Toubro Limited Versus Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise

Case No.: W.P. Nos.23194 and 23200 of 2021 and W.M.P.No.24499 of 2021

Date: 17.04.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: G.Natarajan

Counsel For Respondent: Sai Srujan Tayi

Read More: Landmark Case Analysis: Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan – The Genesis of Workplace Sexual Harassment Law in India

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Patna High Court Upholds GST Summons in Fake ITC Probe; Dismisses Writ Challenging Multiple Notices, Imposes Rs. 25K Cost

The Patna High Court has dismissed a writ petition filed by a construction company...

Mere Deposit in Electronic Ledger Not GST Payment: Andhra Pradesh HC Quashes Composite Order

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has held that mere deposit of tax in the...

Old vs New TDS Sections Mapping under Income-tax Act, 2025: A Detailed Analysis for FY 2026–27

The transition to the new Income-tax framework introduced by the Finance Act, 2026 has...

S. 80C Deductions Explained: How Taxpayers Can Maximise Rs. 1.5 Lakh Benefit Under Old Tax Regime?

Section 80C of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 continues to be one of the most...

More like this

Patna High Court Upholds GST Summons in Fake ITC Probe; Dismisses Writ Challenging Multiple Notices, Imposes Rs. 25K Cost

The Patna High Court has dismissed a writ petition filed by a construction company...

Mere Deposit in Electronic Ledger Not GST Payment: Andhra Pradesh HC Quashes Composite Order

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has held that mere deposit of tax in the...

Old vs New TDS Sections Mapping under Income-tax Act, 2025: A Detailed Analysis for FY 2026–27

The transition to the new Income-tax framework introduced by the Finance Act, 2026 has...