HomeColumnsOld vs New TDS Sections Mapping under Income-tax Act, 2025: A Detailed...

Old vs New TDS Sections Mapping under Income-tax Act, 2025: A Detailed Analysis for FY 2026–27

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The transition to the new Income-tax framework introduced by the Finance Act, 2026 has brought significant structural changes, including the renumbering and rationalisation of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) provisions. While the core principles governing TDS remain largely unchanged, the reclassification of sections under the new Income-tax Act, 2025 has created confusion among taxpayers, deductors, and professionals.

Shift from Old to New TDS Framework

Under the earlier Income-tax Act, 1961, TDS provisions were primarily governed under Chapter XVII-B, covering sections such as 192 (salary), 194C (contract payments), 194J (professional fees), among others. With the implementation of the new Act, these provisions have been reorganised into a new numbering system to simplify compliance and improve structural clarity.

The objective behind this restructuring is to create a more logical grouping of provisions, reduce redundancy, and align the law with modern compliance systems, including faceless and digital tax administration.

Sl. No.Old Section (Income-tax Act 1961)Nature of PaymentNew Section (IT Act 2025)Nature CodeStandard RateThreshold Limit
1192Salary392S01Slab rateNil
2192AEPF withdrawal392S0410%₹50,000
3192BPerquisites / ESOP392S02Slab rateNil
4193Interest on securities393NS1610%₹10,000
5194Dividend393NS0810%₹5,000
6194AInterest (other than securities)393NS0710%₹40,000 / ₹50,000
7194BLottery / game winnings393NS1930%₹10,000
8194BBHorse race winnings393NS2130%₹10,000
9194CContract / Work393NS011% / 2%₹30,000 / ₹1,00,000
10194DInsurance commission393NS105%₹15,000
11194DALife insurance pay-out393NS225%₹1,00,000
12194EPayment to non-resident sportsman393NS2320%Nil
13194EENSS withdrawal393NS2410%₹2,500
14194FMutual fund repurchase393NS2520%Nil
15194GLottery commission393NS265%₹15,000
16194HCommission / Brokerage393NS045%₹15,000
17194IRent393NS05 / NS0610% / 2%₹2,40,000
18194IAPurchase of immovable property393NS271%₹50,00,000
19194IBRent by Individual / HUF393NS285%₹50,000 per month
20194ICJoint development agreement393NS2910%Nil
21194JProfessional / Technical fees393NS02 / NS0310%₹30,000
22194KIncome from mutual fund units393NS3010%₹5,000
23194LALand acquisition compensation393NS1710%₹2,50,000
24194LBInfrastructure debt fund393NS315%Nil
25194LCForeign currency borrowing393NS325%Nil
26194MPayment by Individual / HUF (contract / professional)393NS335%₹50,00,000
27194NCash withdrawal393NS202% / 5%₹1 crore
28194OE-commerce participant393NS131%₹5,00,000
29194QPurchase of goods393NS120.1%₹50,00,000
30194RBenefits / Perquisites393NS1410%₹20,000
31194SVirtual digital asset393NS151%₹50,000 / ₹10,000
32195Payment to non-resident393NS18As per ActNil
33196AIncome of non-resident units393NS3420%Nil
34196BOffshore fund income393NS3510%Nil
35196CForeign company income393NS3610%Nil
36196DForeign institutional investor393NS3720%Nil

Key Features of the New TDS Regime

One of the major highlights of the new system is the consolidation of similar provisions. Payments of a similar nature are now grouped together under broader categories, reducing fragmentation. Additionally, descriptive section headings have been introduced to improve readability and ease of interpretation.

The government has also aimed to align TDS provisions with evolving business practices, including digital transactions, cross-border payments, and automated compliance systems.

Practical Implications for Taxpayers and Deductors

Despite being largely a renumbering exercise, the transition has practical implications. Deductors must ensure that they use the correct section codes while filing TDS returns, making payments, and issuing TDS certificates. Incorrect mapping between old and new sections may lead to compliance errors, notices, or mismatches in tax credit.

Professionals have also highlighted that ERP systems, accounting software, and return filing utilities need to be updated to reflect the revised section codes. Any delay in such updates may lead to operational disruptions.

Continued Applicability of Existing Procedures

It is important to note that while section numbers have changed, the underlying compliance framework—such as deduction timelines, deposit rules, and return filing requirements—continues to remain substantially the same unless specifically amended.

Taxpayers are therefore advised not to assume a change in liability merely due to renumbering, and instead focus on understanding the corresponding provisions under the new law.

Need for Clear Mapping and Awareness

Given the scale of transition, a clear mapping between old and new TDS sections is critical. Such mapping helps in ensuring continuity, especially in cases involving ongoing contracts, long-term payments, or assessments spanning multiple financial years.

Tax authorities are expected to issue detailed guidance and updated utilities to facilitate a smooth transition. However, professionals have stressed the need for greater awareness and training to avoid inadvertent non-compliance.

Conclusion

The restructuring of TDS provisions under the Income-tax Act, 2025 represents a step towards simplification and modernisation of tax laws. However, the success of this transition depends on how effectively taxpayers and professionals adapt to the new framework.

Until systems stabilise and familiarity increases, careful attention to section mapping, compliance procedures, and official notifications will remain essential to avoid errors and litigation.

Read More: S. 80C Deductions Explained: How Taxpayers Can Maximise Rs. 1.5 Lakh Benefit Under Old Tax Regime?

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Patna High Court Upholds GST Summons in Fake ITC Probe; Dismisses Writ Challenging Multiple Notices, Imposes Rs. 25K Cost

The Patna High Court has dismissed a writ petition filed by a construction company...

Mere Deposit in Electronic Ledger Not GST Payment: Andhra Pradesh HC Quashes Composite Order

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has held that mere deposit of tax in the...

S. 80C Deductions Explained: How Taxpayers Can Maximise Rs. 1.5 Lakh Benefit Under Old Tax Regime?

Section 80C of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 continues to be one of the most...

18% GST On Electric Bus Operations Under Cost Contract; ‘Electricity’ Not ‘Fuel’ for Concessional Entry: AAR

The Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that services relating to operation...

More like this

Patna High Court Upholds GST Summons in Fake ITC Probe; Dismisses Writ Challenging Multiple Notices, Imposes Rs. 25K Cost

The Patna High Court has dismissed a writ petition filed by a construction company...

Mere Deposit in Electronic Ledger Not GST Payment: Andhra Pradesh HC Quashes Composite Order

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has held that mere deposit of tax in the...

S. 80C Deductions Explained: How Taxpayers Can Maximise Rs. 1.5 Lakh Benefit Under Old Tax Regime?

Section 80C of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 continues to be one of the most...