HomeGSTNo GST on Renting Residential Property To Social Justice Department for Backward...

No GST on Renting Residential Property To Social Justice Department for Backward Class Girls’ Hostel: Clarifies Authority: AAR

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Maharashtra Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) has ruled that no Goods and Service Tax (GST) is payable on service of renting of residential building to the Social Justice and Special Assistance Department of Maharashtra Government for running a hostel for the backward class girls.

The bench of D. P. Gojamgunde and Priya Jadhav has observed that as the activities related to residential accommodation of the girls or women, belonging to the Backward Classes are held to be exempt from the levy of GST, there is no question of application of the TDS provisions under Section 51 of CGST Act.

The applicant is the owner of the property. The property is being provided on rental basis to the Sant Sakhubai Government Girls Hostel Ahmednagar, a hostel run by the Department of Social Justice & Special Assistance Department of Maharashtra Government. 

The applicant sought the advance ruling on the issue whether service of renting of residential building to the Social Justice and Special Assistance Department of Maharashtra Government for running a hostel for the backward class girls is taxable or exempt?

The AAR ruled that  renting out of immovable property, provided by the Appellant to the State Government, will definitely be construed as activity relation of the function entrusted to a Panchayat under Article 243G of the Constitution, or in relation to the function entrusted to a Municipality under article 243W of the Constitution, and thereby, are rightly eligible for exemption from GST in terms of the exemptionentry at Sl. No. 3 of the Notification No. 12/2017-C.T. (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.

Ruling Details

Applicant Name: M/s. RAVINDRA NAVNATH SATPUTE (DEWOO ENGINEERS)

Date: 27/03/2025

Read More: Sale Deed Can’t Be Executed By Power Of Attorney Holder After Owner’s Death: Supreme Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 4, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 4, 2026.GSTEXECUTIVE CIRCULAR CAN’T CURTAIL STATUTORY...

When Service Tax Is Shown Separately In Invoices, Assessee Can’t Later Claim Cum-Tax Benefit Merely Because Tenant Failed To Pay Tax: CESTAT

The Bengaluru Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), has upheld...

ITAT Remands Rs. 1.47 Crore Addition Over Unexplained Cash Deposits Under S. 69A

The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an addition...

Dept. Failed to Prove Clandestine Removal In ‘Gold Mohar’ Pan Masala Case: CESTAT Quashes Cash and Goods Confiscation 

The Allahabad Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 4, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 4, 2026.GSTEXECUTIVE CIRCULAR CAN’T CURTAIL STATUTORY...

When Service Tax Is Shown Separately In Invoices, Assessee Can’t Later Claim Cum-Tax Benefit Merely Because Tenant Failed To Pay Tax: CESTAT

The Bengaluru Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), has upheld...

ITAT Remands Rs. 1.47 Crore Addition Over Unexplained Cash Deposits Under S. 69A

The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an addition...