HomeNotificationMadhya Pradesh SGST Revises Proper Officer Jurisdiction For Issuing SCN Based on...

Madhya Pradesh SGST Revises Proper Officer Jurisdiction For Issuing SCN Based on Taxpayer Turnover

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madhya Pradesh SGST has revised the jurisdiction of proper officer for issuing the show cause notice under section 74 of the GST Act based on taxpayer turnover.

As per the amendment, the assessment and adjudication responsibilities have been allocated among tax officials based on the annual turnover of the supplier. 

The Joint Commissioner of State Tax will handle cases for suppliers with an annual turnover of up to ₹500 crore, while the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax will oversee suppliers with a turnover of up to ₹40 crore

Read More: Rs. 2,400 Crore GST Demand Confirmed Against HDFC Life Insurance | Latest GST Tax Controversy Update

Similarly, the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax will be responsible for suppliers with an annual turnover of up to ₹40 crore, and the State Tax Officer will manage cases for suppliers with a turnover of up to ₹15 crore

This applies when SCN issued by SGST Officers only.

This structured approach aims to streamline tax administration and ensure efficient adjudication under Section 74 of the Madhya Pradesh SGST Act.

Order Details

Order No. 1/2025

Date: 21/02/2924

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Legality of Gold Confiscation Based on Retracted Statement Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Frames 8 Substantial Questions of Law

The Madhya Pradesh High Court at Indore has admitted an appeal challenging an order...

GST Bank Attachment Can’t Continue Beyond 1 Year: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has ruled that a provisional attachment of a taxpayer’s bank...

Electronic Evidence, Kachcha Parchis and Natural Justice Claims Can’t Bypass GST Appellate Remedy: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a batch of writ petitions challenging GST adjudication...

More like this

Legality of Gold Confiscation Based on Retracted Statement Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Frames 8 Substantial Questions of Law

The Madhya Pradesh High Court at Indore has admitted an appeal challenging an order...

GST Bank Attachment Can’t Continue Beyond 1 Year: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has ruled that a provisional attachment of a taxpayer’s bank...