HomeGSTITC on Electrical Works for Factory Expansion Not Allowed: AAR

ITC on Electrical Works for Factory Expansion Not Allowed: AAR

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Tamil Nadu Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has clarified that Input Tax Credit (ITC) cannot be claimed on electrical installation works undertaken for factory expansion, ruling that such expenses fall under the blocked credit provisions of the GST law.

The bench of B. Suseel Kumar (SGST Member) and C. Thiyagarajan (CGST Member) ruled that the GST paid on the reccipt of Works Contract’ service involving electrical installations for the new factory project, do not become eligible for availment of ITC as they are blocked under clause (c) of the Section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017. Notwithstanding the same, even in the event of considering the supply as an independent ‘Construction’ or Installation’ service, the same again stands blocked under clause (d) of the Section 17(5).

The applicant, Shibaura Machine India Private Limited is a manufacturing company, engaged in the production of injection moulding machinery, had recently expanded its operations by constructing a new facility adjacent to its existing plant near Chennai. As part of the expansion, it entered into a contract for the supply, installation, testing, and commissioning of electrical works, including wiring, fittings, and fire alarm systems.

The company sought an advance ruling on Eligibility of ITC on electrical works carried out for expansion and timeline for availing ITC on tax invoices related to advance payments and adjustments.

The AAR referred to earlier decisions, including those by the Karnataka AAR (2019) and the Gujarat Appellate Authority (2023), both of which had held that ITC on electrical works and fittings is not permissible.

It concluded that electrical installations form part of immovable property and therefore fall under the restrictions in Sections 17(5)(c) and 17(5)(d) of the CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017, which block ITC on construction-related works contracts.

Ruling Details

Applicant’s Name: M/s. Shibaura Machine India Private Limited

Ruling Date: 2025-08-18

Read More: Fire-Fighting Systems Can’t Qualify As ‘Plant And Machinery’, GST ITC Not Available: AAR

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Agricultural Income Can’t Be Treated as Unexplained Money Merely Due to Revised Computation: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted an addition...

Mere Mismatch Between ‘Loan’ and ‘Purchase Advance’ Can’t Trigger S. 69A Addition or S. 263 Revision: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed a revisionary...

Political Donation Can’t Be Treated as Bogus Without Proper Verification of Bank Transactions: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has remanded a dispute...

Interest on Govt. Grant Funds Must Remain Part of Project Corpus, Not Taxable Income: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that interest...

More like this

Agricultural Income Can’t Be Treated as Unexplained Money Merely Due to Revised Computation: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted an addition...

Mere Mismatch Between ‘Loan’ and ‘Purchase Advance’ Can’t Trigger S. 69A Addition or S. 263 Revision: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed a revisionary...

Political Donation Can’t Be Treated as Bogus Without Proper Verification of Bank Transactions: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has remanded a dispute...