Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTITC Relief to Bona Fide Buyers: S. 16(2)(c) and R. 36(4) Read...

ITC Relief to Bona Fide Buyers: S. 16(2)(c) and R. 36(4) Read Down to Allow ITC To Bonafide Recipients from Supplier Default: Karnataka HC

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Karnataka High Court has read down Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act and Rule 36(4) of the CGST Rules to allow the benefit of ITC to bonafide recipients which has complied with all other conditions under Section 16(2) of the CGST Act despite any fault / lapse or non-payment of tax to the government…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari is a Chartered Accountant and a Indirect Tax professional with over 5 years of post-qualification experience in tax advisory, compliance management, and tax process optimization. Associated with SDU LLP since August 2015 spanning his articleship through to his current role as Manager Nikhil has uniquely navigated India’s transition from the legacy tax regime into the GST era.His expertise encompasses both strategic advisory and Indirect Tax litigation, where he represents clients in complex disputes across the manufacturing, service, and e-commerce sectors. By providing high-level counsel to corporate leadership, he ensures that tax positions are not only robust and compliant but also structured for long-term operational efficiency.Beyond his core practice, Nikhil is a proactive contributor to the GST ecosystem. He is dedicated to tracking and analyzing judicial precedents from various High Courts and the Supreme Court, fostering greater clarity and ease of access to tax intelligence for the wider professional community.

Latest articles

Live Cricket Broadcast Fees Not Royalty; ₹6.26 Crore IPL Player Release Fees Also Get Tax Relief: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi, has held that Rs. 244.78 crore received...

‘On-Money’ Addition Deleted As Third-Party Excel Sheet Failed To Establish Undisclosed Payment: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted an addition of ₹2.5 crore...

2 Flats Merged Into 1 Home Qualify For Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has upheld capital gains exemptions totalling ₹28.45...

Dealer Incentives Can’t Be Taxed Merely on Ledger Entries: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...

More like this

Live Cricket Broadcast Fees Not Royalty; ₹6.26 Crore IPL Player Release Fees Also Get Tax Relief: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi, has held that Rs. 244.78 crore received...

‘On-Money’ Addition Deleted As Third-Party Excel Sheet Failed To Establish Undisclosed Payment: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted an addition of ₹2.5 crore...

2 Flats Merged Into 1 Home Qualify For Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has upheld capital gains exemptions totalling ₹28.45...