Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTITC Relief to Bona Fide Buyers: S. 16(2)(c) and R. 36(4) Read...

ITC Relief to Bona Fide Buyers: S. 16(2)(c) and R. 36(4) Read Down to Allow ITC To Bonafide Recipients from Supplier Default: Karnataka HC

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Karnataka High Court has read down Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act and Rule 36(4) of the CGST Rules to allow the benefit of ITC to bonafide recipients which has complied with all other conditions under Section 16(2) of the CGST Act despite any fault / lapse or non-payment of tax to the government…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari is a Chartered Accountant and a Indirect Tax professional with over 5 years of post-qualification experience in tax advisory, compliance management, and tax process optimization. Associated with SDU LLP since August 2015 spanning his articleship through to his current role as Assistant Manager Nikhil has uniquely navigated India’s transition from the legacy tax regime into the GST era.His expertise encompasses both strategic advisory and Indirect Tax litigation, where he represents clients in complex disputes across the manufacturing, service, and e-commerce sectors. By providing high-level counsel to corporate leadership, he ensures that tax positions are not only robust and compliant but also structured for long-term operational efficiency.Beyond his core practice, Nikhil is a proactive contributor to the GST ecosystem. He is dedicated to tracking and analyzing judicial precedents from various High Courts and the Supreme Court, fostering greater clarity and ease of access to tax intelligence for the wider professional community.

Latest articles

GST Dept.’s Inability to Reconcile 4.5 Lakh E-Way Bills Raises Prima Facie Concern: Gujarat High Court Continues Interim Protection to Ford India

The Gujarat High Court has continued interim protection granted to Ford India Private Limited...

S. 153C Notice Invalid Where Deemed Search Date Falls After April 1, 2021: ITAT Quashes 7 Years’ Assessments

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed assessment proceedings...

GSTAT Dismisses Dept. Appeal Over Rs. 7.35 Lakh Interest Demand as Below Rs. 20 Lakh Monetary Limit

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has dismissed a Revenue...

GST Refund Can’t Be Denied by Questioning ITC Eligibility Without S. 73 or 74 Proceedings: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has held that a...

More like this

GST Dept.’s Inability to Reconcile 4.5 Lakh E-Way Bills Raises Prima Facie Concern: Gujarat High Court Continues Interim Protection to Ford India

The Gujarat High Court has continued interim protection granted to Ford India Private Limited...

S. 153C Notice Invalid Where Deemed Search Date Falls After April 1, 2021: ITAT Quashes 7 Years’ Assessments

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed assessment proceedings...

GSTAT Dismisses Dept. Appeal Over Rs. 7.35 Lakh Interest Demand as Below Rs. 20 Lakh Monetary Limit

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has dismissed a Revenue...