Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTCBIC Circular Clarifying ITC Availability On Demo Vehicles Prevails Over AAAR’s Order:...

CBIC Circular Clarifying ITC Availability On Demo Vehicles Prevails Over AAAR’s Order: Bombay High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Goa bench of Bombay High Court has held that the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) Circular clarifying Input Tax Credit (ITC) availability on demo vehicles prevails over order passed by the Appellate Authority of Advance Ruling (AAAR).

The bench of Justice M. S. Karnik and Justice Valmiki Menezes has observed that post issuance of the order by AAAR; the CBIC has issued circular dated 10.09.2024 clarifying that ITC would be available in respect of demo vehicles. The circular would prevail over the order of the AAAR. 

Background

The petitioner/assessee is an authorised dealer for sale of Maruti motor vehicles. It purchases and sells motor vehicles. It places a “demo vehicle” at the showroom for demonstration to customers. It availed input tax credit on demo vehicles. The demo car will be sold after some time. 

It applied to Authority for Advance ruling. The AAR ruled that ITC on demo vehicles is not available as the ITC is not used on “such” vehicles which are sold and the value of demo vehicles is capitalised in the books. Appeal was rejected by the Appellate Authority for Advance ruling. 

Demo Vehicles

Conclusion

The court held that the petitioner would be entitled for benefit of the input tax credit on demo vehicles in terms of the said circular dated 10.09.2024.

Case Details

Case Title: Sai Service Private Limited Versus Union Of India

Case No.: Writ Petition No.622 Of 2024

Date: 24/10/2024

Counsel For Petitioner: Bharat Raichandani, Vibhav Amonkar

Counsel For Respondent: Asha Desai

Click Here To Read Order

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 18, 2026.GSTMADRAS HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CLASSIFICATION...

Dept’s Stand on Export Quota Premium, Rejects CBDT O.M. to Extend S. 80HHC Benefit

The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax treatment...

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...

Circumstantial Evidence Failed to Form Complete Chain: Supreme Court Acquits 4 Murder Accused 

The Supreme Court has acquitted four accused persons in a 2001 murder case from...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 18, 2026.GSTMADRAS HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CLASSIFICATION...

Dept’s Stand on Export Quota Premium, Rejects CBDT O.M. to Extend S. 80HHC Benefit

The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax treatment...

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...