Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTHotels Nationwide Face GST Demand Notices Over Restaurant Service Underpayments

Hotels Nationwide Face GST Demand Notices Over Restaurant Service Underpayments

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Hotels across India are facing a fresh wave of Goods and Services Tax (GST) scrutiny, as authorities issue retrospective demand notices amounting to crores of rupees. The notices allege underpayment of GST on restaurant services provided by hotels, sparking widespread concern within the hospitality industry.

The Issue: Linking Room Tariffs with Restaurant GST Rates

According to GST rules, hotels charging room tariffs above ₹7,500 per night are classified as “specified premises.” For such establishments, restaurant services attract an 18% GST rate, instead of the standard 5%. Hotels charging tariffs below this threshold are liable to pay 5% GST on restaurant services.

Authorities allege that many hotels continued paying only 5% GST on restaurant services even when their tariffs exceeded the ₹7,500 benchmark, leading to the issuance of hefty retrospective tax demands.

For instance, in Pune, the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) reportedly served a notice to a hospital-cum-hotel for underpaying restaurant service taxes between FY 2020–21 and FY 2022–23. Another group of hotels is said to have received demand notices collectively exceeding ₹44.91 lakh for similar issues during the October 2021–July 2023 period.

Industry Cries Foul: “Unfair and Impractical”

Industry associations argue that linking restaurant tax rates to room tariffs is both inequitable and impractical.
“This provision is not about tax evasion but arises from long-standing ambiguities in GST law and lack of awareness,” said K. Syama Raju, President of the Federation of Hotel & Restaurant Associations of India (FHRAI). “Many hotels have now been penalised retrospectively for compliance issues stemming from confusion, not deliberate wrongdoing.”

Legal experts have also raised constitutional concerns. Abhishek A. Rastogi, founder of Rastogi Chambers, noted that such provisions need to be tested on proportionality grounds. “Taxing restaurants at the higher rate just because the hotel room tariff exceeds ₹7,500 leads to disproportionate and absurd results,” he said.

Impact on Walk-In Diners

Hotel operators worry that the current framework unfairly burdens walk-in customers who dine at hotel restaurants but do not book rooms.
“Penalising restaurant services based on room tariffs discourages diners and impacts business fairness,” said Laxman Kariya, Managing Director, St. Laurn Hotels and Resorts.

Long-Standing Ambiguity

The hospitality sector has long struggled with ambiguities surrounding “declared tariff” and “value of services received,” leading to frequent disputes with tax authorities. Industry representatives insist that these notices highlight the urgent need for clearer GST provisions that ensure fairness and simplicity in compliance.

Read More: Black Money Act Inapplicable to Non-Existent Foreign Assets: ITAT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 11 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 11, 2026.GSTMANUFACTURE OR TRADING STATUS IRRELEVANT FOR...

Front-of-Pack Food Warning Labels Must Be Clear, Prominent and Scientifically Justified: Supreme Court Asks FSSAI to Clarify Proposal

The Supreme Court has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)...

DRI | 3 Years’ Custody and Slow Trial Alone Can’t Override NDPS Bail Bar in Commercial Quantity Case: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has refused regular bail to a 70-year-old man accused of...

Rs. 22.44 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case Involving Alleged Routing of Chinese Steel Pipes Through Thailand: Mumbai Court Grants Bail

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Esplanade, Mumbai, has granted bail to a businessman...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 11 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 11, 2026.GSTMANUFACTURE OR TRADING STATUS IRRELEVANT FOR...

Front-of-Pack Food Warning Labels Must Be Clear, Prominent and Scientifically Justified: Supreme Court Asks FSSAI to Clarify Proposal

The Supreme Court has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)...

DRI | 3 Years’ Custody and Slow Trial Alone Can’t Override NDPS Bail Bar in Commercial Quantity Case: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has refused regular bail to a 70-year-old man accused of...