Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTGSTN’s ‘Pending’ Credit Note Feature May Trigger ITC Confusion Between Suppliers and...

GSTN’s ‘Pending’ Credit Note Feature May Trigger ITC Confusion Between Suppliers and Recipients

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has enabled the ‘pending’ credit note feature which may trigger Input Tax Credit (ITC) confusion between suppliers and recipients.

The enhancement also enables taxpayers to modify Input Tax Credit (ITC) reversals upon acceptance of such credit notes, a move aimed at reducing business disputes and improving invoice-level reconciliation between suppliers and recipients.

According to the update, the “Pending” status will allow recipients additional time to verify credit notes before accepting or rejecting them, thereby providing operational flexibility in managing post-sales adjustments and ITC reversals.

However, tax experts have pointed out that the current implementation of the “Pending” option may lead to ambiguity in certain situations. Specifically, where ITC has not been availed from a supplier but a credit note is issued for post-sales discounts, the recipient faces a classification dilemma.

  • Accepting the credit note could incorrectly trigger an ITC reversal that was never claimed.
  • Rejecting it, on the other hand, might increase the supplier’s tax liability, creating compliance mismatches.

To mitigate such issues, experts suggest that the Invoice Matching System (IMS) should introduce three distinct categories to ensure clarity and consistency:

  1. Availed ITC – where credit has been taken and reversal is applicable;
  2. Not Availed ITC – where no credit has been claimed, hence no reversal should arise;
  3. Pending/Under Review – where verification or clarification is awaited.

Additionally, the term “rejection” has been criticized for implying a tax liability burden on the supplier even in genuine cases of non-availment. A more neutral terminology such as “not applicable” or “no credit claimed” could better reflect the commercial reality and avoid unwarranted tax mismatches between supplier and recipient returns.

Read More: GSTN Issues FAQs on GSTR -9/9C for FY 2024-25

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Loan Recovery Can’t Become “Instrument of Oppression”: Supreme Court Awards Rs.10 Lakh Compensation for Midnight Repossession of Truck

The Supreme Court has strongly deprecated the forcible repossession of a borrower’s truck by...

AO Can’t Reopen Income-Tax Settlement Commission’s Final Order Through Reassessment: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that an Assessing Officer cannot invoke the reassessment provisions...

CBI Probe Can’t Be Ordered on Bare Allegations Without Supporting Pleadings or Material: Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to UPPCL Recruitment

The Supreme Court has dismissed a writ petition challenging the selection of Technician Grade-II...

E-Way Bill Generated After Interception Is an Afterthought: GSTAT Upholds S. 129 Penalty

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru, has upheld the levy of...

More like this

Loan Recovery Can’t Become “Instrument of Oppression”: Supreme Court Awards Rs.10 Lakh Compensation for Midnight Repossession of Truck

The Supreme Court has strongly deprecated the forcible repossession of a borrower’s truck by...

AO Can’t Reopen Income-Tax Settlement Commission’s Final Order Through Reassessment: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that an Assessing Officer cannot invoke the reassessment provisions...

CBI Probe Can’t Be Ordered on Bare Allegations Without Supporting Pleadings or Material: Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to UPPCL Recruitment

The Supreme Court has dismissed a writ petition challenging the selection of Technician Grade-II...