Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTBelated Challenge To Single GST SCN For Multiple Years Is An Attempt...

Belated Challenge To Single GST SCN For Multiple Years Is An Attempt To Abruptly Stall Multi-Tiered Adjudicatory Process: Calcutta HC

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Calcutta High Court has challenged the single show cause notice for multiple years dismissed due to delay in filing petition.

The bench of Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury has observed that the belated attempt made by the petitioners to challenge the show cause along with the final order appear to be an attempt made by the petitioners to abruptly stall the multi-tiered adjudicatory process provided for in the scheme of the GST Act.

The petitioner/assessee has challenged a show cause notice and the order passed under Section 74 of the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017, the instant writ petition has been filed. In this case immediately after the show cause notice was issued, the petitioners did not approach this Court to challenge the same. It is only after the final order under Section 74(9) of the GST Act was passed, the petitioners have approached the Court by filing the writ petition.

The petitioner contended that the show-cause notice is flawed as the same seeks to combine multiple tax period.

The department contended that the petitioners have an alternative remedy and as such on such ground the writ petition should not be entertained. All points that the petitioners seek to raise can be raised before the appellate authority. No interference is called for.

The court noted that ordinarily there is no scope to entertain the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Having regard to the efficacious alternative remedy available, the petitioners cannot be permitted to bypass the statutory remedy provided for. 

The court opined that there is no scope to entertain the writ petition especially having regard to the fact that the petitioners at the first instance after the show cause was issued, did not proceed to challenge the same. No exceptional case for interference has been made out.

Case Details

Case Title: UBS Exports International Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Case No.: WPA 1841 of 2025

Date: 05.05.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Mr. Pranit Bag

Counsel For Respondent: Mr. Md. T.M.Siddqui, Ld. AGP

Read More: 10 High-End Drones Seized from Abandoned Baggage at Chennai Airport

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Registration Cancellation Quashed Over Missing Verification Report And Unexplained Retrospective Effect: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has set aside an order cancelling a firm’s GST registration...

Internal Departmental Delays Can’t Extend GST Refund Appeal Deadline: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has dismissed the department’s appeal in a dispute involving recovery...

GST Officer Blocks Rs. 1.61 Crore ITC Beyond His Powers; Allahabad High Court Orders Review Of Similar Cases

The Allahabad High Court has directed the Commissioner, State Tax, to examine whether officers...

GST Recovery Put on Hold as Allahabad HC Flags Substantial Question of Law Over Portal Upload, Communication of Orders

The Allahabad High Court has taken serious note of concerns relating to the chronology...

More like this

GST Registration Cancellation Quashed Over Missing Verification Report And Unexplained Retrospective Effect: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has set aside an order cancelling a firm’s GST registration...

Internal Departmental Delays Can’t Extend GST Refund Appeal Deadline: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has dismissed the department’s appeal in a dispute involving recovery...

GST Officer Blocks Rs. 1.61 Crore ITC Beyond His Powers; Allahabad High Court Orders Review Of Similar Cases

The Allahabad High Court has directed the Commissioner, State Tax, to examine whether officers...