GST Registration Restoration Nullifies ITC Reversal Demand: Andhra Pradesh High Court

HomeGSTGST Registration Restoration Nullifies ITC Reversal Demand: Andhra Pradesh High Court

GST Registration Restoration Nullifies ITC Reversal Demand: Andhra Pradesh High Court

GST Top Stories

Published on

16/01/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

GST Registration Restoration Nullifies ITC Reversal Demand: Andhra Pradesh High Court

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has held that once a GST registration is restored, the consequential demand for reversal of closing Input Tax Credit (ITC) automatically falls, setting aside an assessment order that directs reversal of ITC exceeding Rs. 22.68 lakh. The Bench of Justice R. Raghunandan Rao and Justice T.C.D. Sekhar observed that the…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
GST Registration Restoration

GST Registration Restoration Nullifies ITC Reversal Demand: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Membership Required

Latest articles

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 477 Crore Excise Demand On Pan Masala and Gutkha Citing Lack of Evidence

Nikon India Loses Rs. 7.32 Crore Customs Refund On Imported Digital Cameras: CESTAT

CESTAT Quashes Penalty Over Lack of Proof of ‘Knowledge’ Under Rule 26 in Pan Masala Case

Job Worker Liable for Excise Duty: CESTAT

More like this

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 477 Crore Excise Demand On Pan Masala and Gutkha Citing Lack of Evidence

Nikon India Loses Rs. 7.32 Crore Customs Refund On Imported Digital Cameras: CESTAT

CESTAT Quashes Penalty Over Lack of Proof of ‘Knowledge’ Under Rule 26 in Pan Masala Case

About us

Company

Categories