Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTGST Registration Can’t Be Denied To Person Of Another State: Andhra Pradesh...

GST Registration Can’t Be Denied To Person Of Another State: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has held that the GST registration cannot be denied to person of another state.

The bench of Justice R Raghunandan Rao and Justice Harinath.N has observed that mere apprehension of tax evasion, however well founded, cannot deprive the petitioner of his right to carry on trade and business in the State of Andhra Pradesh. 

The bench stated that Article 19 of the Constitution of India, grants every citizen of this Country, the right to set up and do business anywhere in the country.The order of rejection is clearly without any basis in law.

The petitioner/assessee has sought registration under A.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2005 for its place of business situated in Rajamahendravaram. The application was rejected by the Assistant Commissioner. 

The ground for rejection was that the applicant does not belong to Andhra Pradesh and the authorized representative, put forward by the petitioner, does not belong to the State of Andhra Pradesh. 

The department contended that the registration was refused on the ground that there would be any amount of scope for tax evasion, as none of the responsible persons are from the State of Andhra Pradesh.

The court has held that though the apprehension of the respondents may not be misplaced, it would not mean that registration can be refused on a ground, which is not available under the Statute or the Rules. There does not appear to be any restriction for persons outside the State to come into the State of Andhra Pradesh and seek registration under the APGST Act.

The court allowed the writ petition and quashed the order of rejection. The respondents are directed to register the petitioner under the APGST Act. However, it would be open to the respondents to take such steps, as they deem fit, to monitor the returns of the petitioner and to verify the business activities of the petitioner, for ensuring that there will be no tax evasion. There shall be no order as to costs.

Case Details

Case Title: Tirumala Balaji Marbles And Granites Versus The Assistant Commissioner St and Others

Case No.: Writ Petition No: 1200/2025

Date: 05/02/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Anil Kumar Bezawada

Counsel For Respondent: GP

Read More: Govt. Appoints Suresh Choudhary As Deputy Registrar Of GSTAT Jaipur

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No GST on Assignment of GIDC Leasehold Rights: Gujarat High Court Orders Refund of ITC Reversal With Interest

The Gujarat High Court has held that the assignment of leasehold rights in an...

NCLT Can’t Involve ED or CBI in Company Investigation Without Hearing Affected Parties: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the National Company Law...

Personal Customs Penalty Proceedings Against Company Director Abate After His Death: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has declared that customs penalty proceedings initiated against a company...

GST Order Passed Without Hearing Quashed: Madras High Court 

The Madras High Court has set aside a GST assessment order passed under Section...

More like this

No GST on Assignment of GIDC Leasehold Rights: Gujarat High Court Orders Refund of ITC Reversal With Interest

The Gujarat High Court has held that the assignment of leasehold rights in an...

NCLT Can’t Involve ED or CBI in Company Investigation Without Hearing Affected Parties: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the National Company Law...

Personal Customs Penalty Proceedings Against Company Director Abate After His Death: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has declared that customs penalty proceedings initiated against a company...