GST Pre-Deposit Refunds Governed By Appeal Provisions, Not General Refund S. 54: Supreme Court

HomeGSTGST Pre-Deposit Refunds Governed By Appeal Provisions, Not General Refund S. 54:...

GST Pre-Deposit Refunds Governed By Appeal Provisions, Not General Refund S. 54: Supreme Court

GST Top Stories

Published on

14/01/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

GST Pre-Deposit Refunds Governed By Appeal Provisions, Not General Refund S. 54: Supreme Court

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has held that refunds of statutory pre-deposits made for filing GST appeals are governed by the specific appellate provisions of the GST law and not by the general refund provision under Section 54 of the Jharkhand GST Act, 2017. The bench of Justice Sanjay Kumar and Justice K. Vinod Chandran has observed…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
GST Pre-Deposit Refunds

GST Pre-Deposit Refunds Governed By Appeal Provisions, Not General Refund S. 54: Supreme Court

Membership Required

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 May, 2026

Movement of Goods to Depots for Inventory Replenishment Can’t Be Treated as Inter-State Sale: CESTAT

Customs Broker Can’t Be Penalised for Export of Ergotamine Preparation; S. 117 Not Invocable Where Specific Penalty Provision Exists: CESTAT

Dept. Appeal Doesn’t Automatically Stay Appellate Order; GST Registration Restoration Directions Must Be Followed Without Specific Stay: Allahabad HC

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 May, 2026

Movement of Goods to Depots for Inventory Replenishment Can’t Be Treated as Inter-State Sale: CESTAT

Customs Broker Can’t Be Penalised for Export of Ergotamine Preparation; S. 117 Not Invocable Where Specific Penalty Provision Exists: CESTAT

About us

Company

Categories