GST Portal Notice Alone Not Enough: Madras HC Insists on Alternate Service Despite RPAD Discontinuation From Sept 1, 2025

HomeGSTGST Portal Notice Alone Not Enough: Madras HC Insists on Alternate Service...

GST Portal Notice Alone Not Enough: Madras HC Insists on Alternate Service Despite RPAD Discontinuation From Sept 1, 2025

GST Top Stories

Published on

12/02/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

GST Portal Notice Alone Not Enough: Madras HC Insists on Alternate Service Despite RPAD Discontinuation From Sept 1, 2025

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has held that while uploading notices on the GST portal constitutes valid service, tax authorities must explore alternative modes of service under Section 169 of the GST Act if there is no response from the assessee. The bench of Justice Krishnan Ramasamy has held that when there…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

GST Portal Notice Alone Not Enough: Madras HC Insists on Alternate Service Despite RPAD Discontinuation From Sept 1, 2025

Membership Required

Latest articles

DRI Complaint Before Special Court Not Governed By Private Complaint Procedure: Delhi HC

E-Way Bill and GSTR-3B Mismatch| Allahabad High Court Stays Rs. 142 Crore GST Demand Against Oppo Mobiles

Assessee Can’t Be Left Remediless Due To Improper Communication Of GST Order: Rajasthan High Court Condones Delay

Bombay High Court Permits Amendment Of Reassessment Petitions To Challenge Retrospective Section 147A Inserted By Finance Act, 2026

More like this

DRI Complaint Before Special Court Not Governed By Private Complaint Procedure: Delhi HC

E-Way Bill and GSTR-3B Mismatch| Allahabad High Court Stays Rs. 142 Crore GST Demand Against Oppo Mobiles

Assessee Can’t Be Left Remediless Due To Improper Communication Of GST Order: Rajasthan High Court Condones Delay

About us

Company

Categories