Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTNo GST Payable On These 9 Activities Of Municipality: AAR 

No GST Payable On These 9 Activities Of Municipality: AAR 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Tamil Nadu Authority of Advance Ruling has held that no Goods and Service Tax (GST) is payable by the Municipality on the activities of Maintenance of Park, Providing Market facilities-daily, Providing Market facilities-weekly, Providing bays in bus stand, lLocker rent facilities, Providing Slaughterhouse facilities, Providing Toilet facilities, Providing stand for cycle, scooter, auto, four wheeler stand in bus stand and other places.

The bench of B. Senthilvelavan and Kurinji Selvaan V.S. has observed that the applicant supplies the Right to collect the fees /right to certain amenities to the contractors and the supply undertaken by the contractors are as per the tender conditions which is an independent supply. The applicability of the Notification to the supplies of the contractors is not answered as per Section 95(a) read with S. 103(1) of the GST Act.

The applicant, M/S. Tiruppur City Municipal Corporation is a “Municipality” as defined in clause (e) of article 243P of the Constitution. They are rendering taxable services renting of immovable property service, mandap keeper service and are doing the functions entrusted to a municipality under Twelfth Schedule to Article 243W of the Constitution. 

The applicant has stated that there are two charges collected road cutting charges towards laying of cable and (i) renting of road for the optical cables. Their claim is renting of space for laying cable is the principal supply and therefore applying the definition of ‘composite Supply’ under S.230) of the GST Act, road cutting charges has to be treated as renting and the whole service has to be classified as renting of immovable property.

The AAR has held that supply of allowing the road cut for laying the OFC and allowing the space alongside the road for the OFC lines are not ‘composite supply’ as defined under S. 2(30) of the GST Act, 2017 in as much as these two supplies are not made in conjunction with each other in the ordinary course of business. Hence Composite supply cannot be applied for classifying the said service as ‘Renting of Immovable property service’.

Ruling Details

Applicant Name: Tiruppur City Municipal Corporation

Date: 28.04.2021

Read More: What’s Left In CA Profession? UDINs Sold for Rs. 1,000, Tax Audits Done for Rs. 2,500 Without Verification

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Rights Shares Below Market Value Not Automatically Taxable: Bombay HC Quashes Income Tax Reopening

The Bombay High Court has quashed reassessment proceedings over an alleged ₹329.03 crore benefit...

Revised GST Return Forms To Be Open For Public Feedback From November 1; Rollout Planned For April 2027

The Finance Ministry will open a month-long public consultation on revised monthly Goods and...

Excise Rebate Order Defies Earlier Directions: Gujarat High Court Issues Contempt Notice To Additional Secretary

The Gujarat High Court has issued notice for initiating contempt proceedings against an Additional...

No Mini-Trial at Cognizance Stage: Directors’ Claim of Cooperation Must Be Examined During Trial

The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash criminal proceedings against two individuals facing...

More like this

Rights Shares Below Market Value Not Automatically Taxable: Bombay HC Quashes Income Tax Reopening

The Bombay High Court has quashed reassessment proceedings over an alleged ₹329.03 crore benefit...

Revised GST Return Forms To Be Open For Public Feedback From November 1; Rollout Planned For April 2027

The Finance Ministry will open a month-long public consultation on revised monthly Goods and...

Excise Rebate Order Defies Earlier Directions: Gujarat High Court Issues Contempt Notice To Additional Secretary

The Gujarat High Court has issued notice for initiating contempt proceedings against an Additional...