Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeColumnsWhat’s Left In CA Profession? UDINs Sold for Rs. 1,000, Tax Audits...

What’s Left In CA Profession? UDINs Sold for Rs. 1,000, Tax Audits Done for Rs. 2,500 Without Verification

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a recent post on X (formerly Twitter), Chartered Accountant Dinesh Wadera highlighted alarming practices in the tax audit sector. He pointed out that some individuals are offering Unique Document Identification Numbers (UDINs) for as low as Rs.1,000 and conducting tax audits for Rs. 2,500 without proper verification.

If some people offering UDIN for ₹1000 and doing tax audits for ₹2500 that too without any verification, then tell me—what’s left in this profession? What’s left in traditional CA practice?” the tweet read.

Wadera, a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) and an educator, expressed concern over these unethical practices. He emphasized that such actions compromise the integrity of the auditing process and undermine the trust placed in financial reporting.

The UDIN system was introduced by ICAI to ensure authenticity and prevent misuse of chartered accountants’ signatures.However, the emergence of these practices suggests a need for stricter enforcement and awareness among professionals.

The ICAI has yet to issue an official statement regarding these concerns. Nevertheless, Wadera’s post has sparked discussions within the accounting community about maintaining ethical standards and the importance of upholding the profession’s credibility.

The ICAI (Institute of Chartered Accountants of India) recommends minimum indicative fees for tax audits. For Class A cities, the minimum is Rs. 40,000 and above, while for Class B cities, it’s Rs. 30,000 and above. These fees are not mandatory, and CAs can charge more based on the complexity of the audit. 

Read More: Plaint Can Be Amended Anytime for Alternative Relief, But Courts Can’t Grant Suo Moto Refund U/s 22 of Specific Relief Act: Supreme Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...

More like this

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...