Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTGST Orders for FY 2024–25 Can’t Be Passed Under Omitted S. 73,...

GST Orders for FY 2024–25 Can’t Be Passed Under Omitted S. 73, 74; Must Follow S. 74A: Madras HC

GST

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
GST Orders for FY 2024–25 Can’t Be Passed Under Omitted S. 73, 74; Must Follow S. 74A: Madras HC

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has ruled that GST proceedings relating to the financial year 2024–25 cannot be initiated or concluded under the omitted Sections 73 and 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act.  The bench of Justice Krishnan Ramasamy has observed that the newly introduced Section 74A applies…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Columns

Why do GST Dept. Recover ITC From Buyers When Suppliers Fail to Deposit Tax?

A purchaser may hold a valid tax invoice, receive the goods or services, pay...
Supreme Court

Test Identification Parade is Corroborative Evidence And Not Substantive: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has acquitted a man sentenced to imprisonment for the remainder of...
Supreme Court

Corporate Criminal Case Can’t Be Quashed Merely Because No Employee Is Named as Accused: Supreme Court Lays Down 3 Stage Mens Rea Test

The Supreme Court has held that criminal proceedings against a company cannot be quashed...
Supreme Court

Land Allotment Not Mandatory at Initial Stage of Environmental Clearance Application for Biomedical Waste Facility: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that prior allotment or procurement of land is not...

More like this

Columns

Why do GST Dept. Recover ITC From Buyers When Suppliers Fail to Deposit Tax?

A purchaser may hold a valid tax invoice, receive the goods or services, pay...
Supreme Court

Test Identification Parade is Corroborative Evidence And Not Substantive: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has acquitted a man sentenced to imprisonment for the remainder of...
Supreme Court

Corporate Criminal Case Can’t Be Quashed Merely Because No Employee Is Named as Accused: Supreme Court Lays Down 3 Stage Mens Rea Test

The Supreme Court has held that criminal proceedings against a company cannot be quashed...