HomeGSTHimachal Pradesh High Court Upholds GST On Royalty Paid By Mineral Concession...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds GST On Royalty Paid By Mineral Concession Holder For Any Mining Concession Granted By State

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Himachal Pradesh High Court has upheld the GST on royalty paid by mineral concession holders for any mining concession granted by state.

The bench of Acting Chief Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan and Justice Satyen Vaidya has observed that the judgment rendered in India Cement Ltd.’s case has now been overruled by Nine-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Mineral Area Development Authority & anr. vs. M/s Steel Authority of India & anr. In which it has been held that royalty is not a tax. 

Background – GST on royalty paid by mineral concession holders

The petitioner/assessee has raised the issue whether there can be levy of GST on royalty paid by the mineral concession holder for any mining concession granted by the State.

The petitioner relied on the judgement rendered by Seven- Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in India Cement Ltd. and ors. vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors. In which it was declared that royalty itself is a tax.

Earlier the demand for GST on royalty by the respondents was stayed by the Division Bench of the Court.

Conclusion

The court upheld the notices and dismissed the petition of the assessee.

Read More: Electronic Credit Ledger Can’t Be Blocked Citing Enforcement Authority’s Reports: Karnataka High Court

Case Details

Case Title:  M/s Lakhwinder Singh Stone Crusher Versus Union of India & ors.

Case No.:  CWP No. 8637/2023

Date: 4.11.2024

Counsel For Petitioner: Arvind Sharma

Counsel For Respondent: Anup Rattan

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Notice Issued After April 1, 2021 Without Jurisdiction: ITAT Quashes S. 153C Assessment

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench has quashed an assessment framed under...

Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Against Singapore Company After Finding No Effective Opportunity of Hearing

The Delhi High Court has set aside reassessment proceedings and the consequential demand raised...

CIT(A) Can’t Direct Reopening of Another AY: ITAT 

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Rajkot Bench, has held that a Commissioner of...

Form 26AS Receipts vs Income — Assessee Fails to Prove ₹7.83 Crore Difference Was NPGCL Advance: ITAT 

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld the assessment...

More like this

Notice Issued After April 1, 2021 Without Jurisdiction: ITAT Quashes S. 153C Assessment

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench has quashed an assessment framed under...

Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Against Singapore Company After Finding No Effective Opportunity of Hearing

The Delhi High Court has set aside reassessment proceedings and the consequential demand raised...

CIT(A) Can’t Direct Reopening of Another AY: ITAT 

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Rajkot Bench, has held that a Commissioner of...