Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTGST ITC Allowed On Steel Reinforcements Of Factory Expansion For Manufacturing Activity:...

GST ITC Allowed On Steel Reinforcements Of Factory Expansion For Manufacturing Activity: AAR

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Tamil Nadu Bench of Authority of Advance Ruling has held that GST ITC allowed on steel reinforcements for expansion of factory for manufacturing activity.

The bench of I.R.S. C.Thiyagarajan and B.Suseel Kumar has observed that the Applicant would be eligible for input tax credit proportionate to the extent of steel structural support erected in relation to the secondary steel works that is attributable to the support of HVAC machine and overhead crane movement only, subject to fulfilment of conditions stipulated in Section s 17(5)(c) and 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017 and the explanation thereunder.

The applicant is engaged in the business of manufacture of injection moulding machinery and accessories. They further stated that they are expanding their business operation and have constructed a new factory adjacent to its existing factory and incurred capital expenditure towards procurement in relation to setting up of this factory. The applicant for the purpose of the factory expansion project, had entered into a contract with Mis. SMCC Construction India Ltd (Supplier or Vendor) for construction of its new factory. Perusal of the invoices issued reveals that the above said construction works falls under SAC 995413 – Design and Construction services of Greenfield Industrial Building Project (Package 1), leviable to 18% GST.

The applicant sought the advance ruling on the issue of whether Input Tax Credit (ITC) is eligible on steel reinforcements for expansion of factories for manufacturing activity? What should be the basis to arrive at the timeline to avail ITC on tax invoice raised by Supplier to bill “Advance Component” of the Contract and Subsequent Adjustment ofAdvance in the Service Bills showing both Gross and Net amount.

The AAR ruled that the timeline to avail ITC on tax invoice raised by Supplier to bill “Advance Component” of the Contract is already covered under the provisions of Section 16(4) of the CGST Act, 2017, which stipulates that ITC shall be availed by the recipient before the thirtieth day of November following the end of financial year to which such invoice pertains or furnishing of the relevant annual return, whichever is earlier.

Ruling Details

Applicant’s Name: Shibaura Machine India Private Limited

Ruling Date: 2025-09-02

Read More: ‘Consultation’, ‘Supply Of Medicine’ By Hospital To Out-Patients Not A ‘Composite Supply’: AAR

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

‘On-Money’ Addition Deleted As Third-Party Excel Sheet Failed To Establish Undisclosed Payment: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted an addition of ₹2.5 crore...

2 Flats Merged Into 1 Home Qualify For Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has upheld capital gains exemptions totalling ₹28.45...

Dealer Incentives Can’t Be Taxed Merely on Ledger Entries: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...

Customs Interest Can’t Be Backdated Before Confiscation Liability Is Determined; Nearly 8 Year Period Excluded: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that interest arising from customs confiscation and redemption...

More like this

‘On-Money’ Addition Deleted As Third-Party Excel Sheet Failed To Establish Undisclosed Payment: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted an addition of ₹2.5 crore...

2 Flats Merged Into 1 Home Qualify For Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has upheld capital gains exemptions totalling ₹28.45...

Dealer Incentives Can’t Be Taxed Merely on Ledger Entries: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...