Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTNo GST Exemption On Supply Of Dredging Services To Gujarat Maritime Board:...

No GST Exemption On Supply Of Dredging Services To Gujarat Maritime Board: AAR

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gujarat Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that no Goods and Service Tax (GST) exemption is allowable on supply of dredging services to Gujarat Maritime Board under serial No. 3A of notification No. 9/2017-IT (Rate) dated 28.6.2017 as amended by notification No. 2/2018-IT (Rate) dated 25.1.2018.

The bench of P.B. Meena and Kamal Shukla has observed that though the tenders are being floated by the Director of Fisheries, Gujarat Maritime Board (GMB) is the owner of the port. The dredging services rendered by the applicant are being received by GMB. Now, GMB does not fall within the ambit of either the Central Government, State Government or Union Territory or local authority. Thus, the third condition that the supply is to be provided to the Central Government, State Government or Union Territory is not satisfied. Further, GMB is not a local authority in terms of section 2(69) of the CGST Act, 2017. Thus, the condition not having been fulfilled, the applicant is ineligible for the benefit of the notification.

The applicant, M/s. Kishor Projects Pvt. Ltd. has been awarded the dredging contract by the Fisheries Department. The applicant’s averment is that the dredging service rendered would fall within the exemption notification.

The applicant sought the advance ruling on issue whether the supply of services of dredging activity undertaken by the applicant provided to Gujarat Maritime Board is covered under serial No. 3A of notification No. 9/2017-IT (Rate) dated 28.6.2017 as amended by notification No. 2/2018-IT (Rate) dated 25.1.2018.

The AAR held that GMI does not fall within the ambit of either the Central Government, Statc (government or union ‘territory or local authority) and the term ‘government entity’ stands omitted from the exemption notification. 

Ruling Details

Applicant Name: Kishor Projects

Date: 25/03/2025

Read More: ITC Available on Canteen Services for Factory Employees, Limited to Employer’s Cost Share: AAR

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Rent-a-Cab and Staff Welfare Expenses

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Delayed Payment Alone Can’t Trigger Higher Duty on All Packing Machines: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata Bench has held that...

One-to-One Input-Export Correlation Not Required: CESTAT Quashes Recovery of Cenvat Refund

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Advance Authorisation Exemption Valid and Dept. Failed to Prove Imports Were Wind-Turbine Castings: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Rent-a-Cab and Staff Welfare Expenses

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Delayed Payment Alone Can’t Trigger Higher Duty on All Packing Machines: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata Bench has held that...

One-to-One Input-Export Correlation Not Required: CESTAT Quashes Recovery of Cenvat Refund

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...