Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTGST Dept. Can’t Invoke S. 74 Without Evidence of Fraud or Suppression:...

GST Dept. Can’t Invoke S. 74 Without Evidence of Fraud or Suppression: Gujarat HC

GST

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
GST Dept. Can’t Invoke S. 74 Without Evidence of Fraud or Suppression: Gujarat HC

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gujarat High Court has quashed a show-cause notice and subsequent tax order holding that the GST department cannot resort to Section 74 of the GST CAct in the absence of fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts. The bench of Justice Bhargav D. Karia and Justice Pranav Trivedi ruled that the GST authorities wrongly…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

DGFT’s Policy Interpretation Can’t Override CESTAT’s Statutory Jurisdiction: Madras High Court Dismisses PIL Over DFIA Imports

The Madras High Court has held that a provision in the Foreign Trade Policy...
Indirect Taxes

Customs Brokers Can’t Rely Solely On Importer’s Documents When Gold-Origin Certificates Remain Unverified: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has dismissed a customs broker’s writ petition challenging an adjudication...
Indirect Taxes

CESTAT Has No Jurisdiction Over Baggage Disputes: Madras High Court Condones 37-Day Delay In Gold Confiscation Revision

The Madras High Court has held that the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate...
GST

GST Portal Notices Going Unanswered? Officers Must Explore Other Modes of Service: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that GST officers should explore alternative modes of...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

DGFT’s Policy Interpretation Can’t Override CESTAT’s Statutory Jurisdiction: Madras High Court Dismisses PIL Over DFIA Imports

The Madras High Court has held that a provision in the Foreign Trade Policy...
Indirect Taxes

Customs Brokers Can’t Rely Solely On Importer’s Documents When Gold-Origin Certificates Remain Unverified: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has dismissed a customs broker’s writ petition challenging an adjudication...
Indirect Taxes

CESTAT Has No Jurisdiction Over Baggage Disputes: Madras High Court Condones 37-Day Delay In Gold Confiscation Revision

The Madras High Court has held that the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate...