HomeGSTAllahabad High Court Stays GST Demand on Mining Royalty

Allahabad High Court Stays GST Demand on Mining Royalty

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, has stayed the demand of Goods and Services Tax (GST) on royalty payments made by miners, pending the outcome of related proceedings before the Supreme Court and another writ petition pending before the High Court.

The Division Bench comprising Justice Shekhar B. Saraf and Justice Prashant Kumar heard the counsel for the petitioner, Mudit Agarwal, submitted that the question of whether GST is payable on mining royalty is already under consideration before the Supreme Court in SLP (C) No. 37326 of 2017, where the apex court has granted a stay on payment of GST on royalty.

The Bench noted that the same issue is also being examined by the Allahabad High Court in Writ Tax No. 823 of 2025and directed that the present petition be listed along with that case.

In the interim, the Court granted relief to the petitioner by staying the GST demand for the tax periods 2018–19, 2019–20, 2020–21, 2021–22, and 2022–23, relying on the reasons recorded in an earlier leading case—Writ Tax No. 475 of 2021at Allahabad, where similar interim protection had been granted.

The Court’s direction provides temporary respite to the mining leaseholders who have been facing GST demands on royalty payments, a contentious issue that continues to be litigated at multiple judicial levels.

Case Title: Gopal Pandey v. State of U.P. & Others
Case No.: Writ Tax No. 1053 of 2025
Date: 07/10/2025
Counsel for Petitioner: Mudit Agarwal
Counsel for Respondents: C.S.C., K.D. Nag

Read More: DGCA Approved Flight Training Courses Exempt From GST: Allahabad High Court Directs AAR To Reconsider

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Mixing of Phosphogypsum, Dolomite to Make ‘Soil Conditioner’ Amounts to Manufacture but Product Not Excisable: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore Bench, has held that...

VoIP Phones with Video & Data Capabilities Classifiable under CTH 8517 62 90; IBM India Denied Customs Exemption: CESTAT

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Service Tax Under RCM Payable on ‘Bonus Payments’ Linked to Performance: CESTAT 

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Roasted Areca Nuts Not Fit for Consumption: CESTAT Allows Provisional Release for Industrial Use Under Strict Supervision

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad Bench, has permitted the...

More like this

Mixing of Phosphogypsum, Dolomite to Make ‘Soil Conditioner’ Amounts to Manufacture but Product Not Excisable: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore Bench, has held that...

VoIP Phones with Video & Data Capabilities Classifiable under CTH 8517 62 90; IBM India Denied Customs Exemption: CESTAT

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Service Tax Under RCM Payable on ‘Bonus Payments’ Linked to Performance: CESTAT 

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...