HomeGSTAndhra Pradesh High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order For Non-Mention Of DIN

Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order For Non-Mention Of DIN

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has quashed the Goods and Service Tax (GST) assessment order for non-mention of Document Identification Number  (DIN).

The bench of Justice R Raghunandan Rao and Justice K Manmadha Rao has observed that the Supreme Court in the case of Pradeep Goyal Vs. Union of India & Ors has observed that an order, which does not contain a DIN number would be non-est and invalid.

The petitioner has challenged the assessment order, in FORM GST DRC – 07, passed by the department under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

The assessment order is challenged by the petitioner, on various grounds, including the ground that the said proceedings did not contain a DIN number.

The issue raised was in respect of non-inclusion of DIN number on proceedings, under the G.S.T. Act

The court held that the non-mention of a DIN number in the order, which was uploaded in the portal, requires the order to be set aside.

The court directed the department to conduct fresh assessment, after giving notice to the petitioner and assigning a DIN number to the said order. The period from the date of the impugned assessment order, till the date of receipt of this order shall be excluded for the purposes of limitation. 

Case Details

Case Title: Andhra Evangelical Lutheran Church Versus The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Case No.: Writ Petition No: 9266/2025

Date: 9/04/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: A V BADRA NAGA SESHAYYA

Counsel For Respondent: GP

Read More: One State One RRB: Govt. Notifies Amalgamation Of 26 RRBs

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Delayed Payment Charges On Stock Broking Advances Are Interest, Not Taxable Service: CESTAT

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Mixed Iron Ore Consignments To Be Treated As Iron Ore Fines: CESTAT 

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that the blocking of Input Tax...

Hotels Can’t Claim Service Tax Abatement After Availing CENVAT Credit On Maintenance, Internet & Courier Services: CESTAT

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

Delayed Payment Charges On Stock Broking Advances Are Interest, Not Taxable Service: CESTAT

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Mixed Iron Ore Consignments To Be Treated As Iron Ore Fines: CESTAT 

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that the blocking of Input Tax...