HomeGSTGlitch in Auto-populated Figures of B2C in GSTR-9 When Amendments Are Made...

Glitch in Auto-populated Figures of B2C in GSTR-9 When Amendments Are Made for Previous FY 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

A significant systemic glitch has been noticed in the GST portal’s auto-populated data for Table B2C of GSTR-9, particularly affecting cases where amendments pertaining to the previous financial year are made in the current financial year.

Tax professionals and businesses have reported that when an amendment related to B2C invoices of FY 2023–24 is made during FY 2024–25, the auto-populated figures in the Annual Return (GSTR-9) for FY 2024–25 are incorrectly adjusted. This anomaly appears only in the B2C section, while B2B amendments are being reflected accurately in the relevant tables.

When a taxpayer amends B2C invoices of FY 2023–24 in FY 2024–25 (for example, correcting taxable value or tax amount), the system erroneously adds or reduces the corresponding figures in Table 4 of GSTR-9 for FY 2024–25.

However, as per the GST law and the structure of the annual return Table 4 of GSTR-9 should reflect details only of transactions pertaining to the reporting year (i.e., FY 2024–25). Amendments of the preceding year should not impact this table.

This misalignment leads to inaccurate reporting of outward supplies, creating potential mismatches and confusion during reconciliation.

B2B vs. B2C Discrepancy

The issue seems confined to the B2C segment. When taxpayers make B2B amendments (for example, adding or modifying invoices of FY 2023–24 in FY 2024–25), the GST portal processes these changes correctly — reflecting them under “Amendments relating to supplies of earlier financial years” and not disturbing the current year’s Table 4 values.

In contrast, for B2C amendments, the system is incorrectly netting off such adjustments within the current year’s turnover figures, thereby distorting total taxable value and tax liability auto-populated in the GSTR-9.

Read More: LOOK AT New Simplified Online GST Registration Interface

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 28 May, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for May 28, 2026.GSTPUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT...

Liquidation After Successful Resolution Applicant Backtracks From CoC-Approved RP: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that a Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA) cannot withdraw from...

S. 138 NI Act Proceedings Continue Despite Personal Insolvency Moratorium Under IBC: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments...

No TIP, Doubtful Identification: Supreme Court Acquits Convicts In Rape-Murder Case

The Supreme Court has acquitted two men who had been sentenced to death in...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 28 May, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for May 28, 2026.GSTPUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT...

Liquidation After Successful Resolution Applicant Backtracks From CoC-Approved RP: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that a Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA) cannot withdraw from...

S. 138 NI Act Proceedings Continue Despite Personal Insolvency Moratorium Under IBC: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments...