HomeGSTGeneral Penalty Can’t Be Levied For Late Filing Of GST Returns In...

General Penalty Can’t Be Levied For Late Filing Of GST Returns In Presence Of Specific Penalty: Madras High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madras High Court has held that the general penalty cannot be levied for late filing of GST returns in presence of specific penalty.

The bench of Justice Krishnan Ramasamy has observed that a penalty was imposed in the form of late fee in terms of Section 47 of the GST Act. Therefore, the general penalty of Rs.50,000 towards CGST and SGST is not correct and is liable to be set aside. 

As per Section 47 of the TNGST Act, 2017 only late fee can be levied. The provision under Section 125 of the Act, will apply only in the case where no penalty is levied under Section 47 of the GSTN Act. No notice was issued as per Section 46 of the Act, however, penalty proceedings have been initiated against the petitioner. 

When Section 47 of the GST Act is available, for levy of the late fee, in the event of filing the return belatedly, in the present case, notice has been issued under Section 47 r/w 73 of the GST Act and no notice can be issued in terms of Section 73 of the GST Act.

The petitioner has not challenged the late fee imposed upon them. Their contention is only to the extent that no notice was issued before issuing the show cause notice. Already a return has been filed, however, the petitioner has not filed their turnover. The respondent without properly communicating about the assessment proceedings, has straight away issued show cause notice under Section 73 of the GST Act. Section 73 of the Act pertains only to determination of tax and the same does not spell about non-filing of returns. 

The court held that as per Section 44 of the GST Act, there was delay in filing the annual return by the petitioner. In the event of delay in filing the annual return, late fee would be levied under Section 47(2) of the GST Act. 

Case Details

Case Title: Tvl.Jainsons Castors & Industrial Products Versus The Assistant Commissioner (ST)

Case No.: W.P.No.36614 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.39493 of 2024

Date: 04.02.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: M.Varun Pandian

Counsel For Respondent: C. Harsha Raj

Read More: IIFL Not Liable To Pay Service Tax On Delayed Payment Charges Collected Towards Credit Facilities: CESTAT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

S. 153C Proceedings Invalid If Satisfaction for ‘Other Person’ Recorded After April 1, 2021: ITAT

The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that proceedings...

GST Limitation Applies to Issuance of Assessment Order, Not Its Service: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court has held that under Section 73 of the Goods and...

ITC Relief Denied Where Supplier Fails to Deposit Tax: Supreme Court Upholds Validity of S. 16(2)(c) of CGST Act

The Supreme Court has upheld the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the Central...

CA’s Alleged Misappropriation No Ground to Escape Tax Liability: Supreme Court Refuses to Interfere in GST Demand Case

The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Punjab and Haryana High Court's...

More like this

S. 153C Proceedings Invalid If Satisfaction for ‘Other Person’ Recorded After April 1, 2021: ITAT

The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that proceedings...

GST Limitation Applies to Issuance of Assessment Order, Not Its Service: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court has held that under Section 73 of the Goods and...

ITC Relief Denied Where Supplier Fails to Deposit Tax: Supreme Court Upholds Validity of S. 16(2)(c) of CGST Act

The Supreme Court has upheld the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the Central...