HomeGSTSummary Of Show-Cause Notice In Form GST DRC-01 Without Officer’s Digital Signature...

Summary Of Show-Cause Notice In Form GST DRC-01 Without Officer’s Digital Signature Quashed: Jharkhand High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Jharkhand High Court has quashed the summary of show-cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 without the officer’s digital signature.

The bench of Chief Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao and Justice Rajesh Shankar observed that summary of show-cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 as well as the order under Section 73 of the Jharkhand GST Act dated 28th August, 2024 do not bear the digital signature of the State Tax Officer.

The bench relied on the decision in the case of Rajendra Modi vs. State of Jharkhand in which it was held that the Jharkhand High Court deprecate the practice on the part of the department in issuing show cause notices and passing orders without putting a digital signature or a physical signature particularly when Rule 26(3) of the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax (SGST) Rules, 2017 mandates issuance of notices, certificates or orders only through a digital signature certificate.

The principal contention of the petitioner/assessee was that the show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 issued does not contain the signature and seal or digital signature of officer who issued it and even the summary of the order in Form GST DRC-07 was unsigned and does not bear digital signature of the officer.

The court quashed the proceedings as well as the order and granted the liberty to the department to initiate proceedings afresh, if permitted by law.

Case Details

Case Title: Sadanand Prasad Barnwal Versus The State of Jharkhand  

Case No.: W.P.(T) No.423 of 2025

Date: 08.05.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate

Counsel For Respondent: Gaurav Raj

Read More: TR-6 Challans Sufficient Proof of Duty Incidence Borne by Importer; CESTAT Directs Customs Dept. To Refund SAD

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 14, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 14, 2026.GSTGUJARAT HIGH COURT SEEKS STATUS...

Excise Dept. Failed To Establish Pouch Packing Machines Used For Manufacturing Gutka Installed And Operational Prior To May 2011: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai Bench held that the...

Despatch Money for Faster Cargo Unloading Not Taxable as ‘Port Service’: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that...

Value of Land Can’t Be Included in Taxable Value for ‘Club or Association Service’: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 14, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 14, 2026.GSTGUJARAT HIGH COURT SEEKS STATUS...

Excise Dept. Failed To Establish Pouch Packing Machines Used For Manufacturing Gutka Installed And Operational Prior To May 2011: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai Bench held that the...

Despatch Money for Faster Cargo Unloading Not Taxable as ‘Port Service’: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that...