HomeNotificationCBIC Extends Compliance Timeline Under Sea Cargo Manifest Rules Till March 31,...

CBIC Extends Compliance Timeline Under Sea Cargo Manifest Rules Till March 31, 2026

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has extended the compliance timeline prescribed under the Sea Cargo Manifest and Transshipment Regulations, 2018 till 31 March 2026. 

The notification amends the Sea Cargo Manifest and Transshipment Regulations, 2018 by substituting the existing date mentioned in Form-XII, Table, Serial No. 6. The earlier prescribed deadline has now been replaced with a new date — “31.03.2026”.

This amendment has been brought through the Sea Cargo Manifest and Transshipment (Fifth Amendment) Regulations, 2025, and comes into force from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette.

The CBIC has exercised its rule-making powers under Section 157 of the Customs Act, 1962, read with several substantive provisions, including Sections 30, 30A, 41, 41A, 53, 54, 56, sub-section (3) of Section 98, and sub-section (2) of Section 158 of the Act.

These provisions collectively govern the filing of import/export manifests, transshipment procedures, obligations of carriers, and electronic compliance requirements under the customs law framework.

The Sea Cargo Manifest and Transshipment Regulations, 2018 were originally notified on May 11, 2018, with the objective of streamlining cargo reporting requirements, enhancing transparency, and strengthening risk management in maritime trade. Over the years, the regulations have undergone several amendments to address operational challenges and implementation issues faced by the trade.

Notification Details

Notification No.  79/2025-Customs (N.T.)

Date: 31/12/2025

Read More: CBIC Revises Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap; New Rates Effective from January 1, 2026

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC

The Kerala High Court has quashed a GST assessment order passed against a registered...

Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has set aside three orders passed by the Policy Relaxation...

Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has quashed a criminal complaint and summoning order...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses To Quash Drugs Act Complaint Against Hand Sanitizer Manufacturer Over “Not of Standard Quality” Allegations

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has refused to quash criminal proceedings initiated against...

More like this

No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC

The Kerala High Court has quashed a GST assessment order passed against a registered...

Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has set aside three orders passed by the Policy Relaxation...

Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has quashed a criminal complaint and summoning order...