HomeGSTDelhi HC Allows Firm to File Fresh Objections Against...

Delhi HC Allows Firm to File Fresh Objections Against DGGI’s Provisional Bank Account Attachment

The Delhi High Court has permitted GMG Tradelink Pvt. Ltd. to file fresh objections against the provisional attachment of its bank accounts ordered by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI). 

The bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Shail Jain clarified that the Principal Additional Director General of DGGI is duly empowered to exercise powers under Section 83 of the CGST Act, relying on Notification No. 14/2017 dated 1 July 2017. 

Section 83 allows provisional attachment to safeguard government revenue during investigation proceedings. Such attachments remain valid for one year, after which the authority must review continuation. 

The company had approached the Court challenging the order dated 6 March 2025, through which its current accounts held with ICICI Bank, Bhiwani Mandi, were provisionally attached. 

The petitioner argued that the attachment order was passed by an authority not competent under Section 83 of the CGST Act. The company had already raised objections before the Commissioner, DGGI, under Rule 159(5), highlighting the issue of jurisdiction

The government counsel produced Notification No. 14/2017, showing that the Principal Additional Director General, DGGI, is equivalent in rank to a Principal Commissioner, thereby competent to exercise provisional attachment powers under Section 83. 

The court held that the jurisdictional objection does not survive, in view of the 2017 notification. However, the petitioner is allowed to file fresh objections regarding the attachment. Upon filing, DGGI must communicate reasons for the attachment within two weeks. 

The Court disposed of the petition while keeping all legal remedies open for the company, based on the outcome of the objection process. 

Case Details

Case Title: GMG Tradelink Pvt. Ltd. Versus DGGI

Case No.: W.P.(C) 16259/2025 & CM APPL. 66504/2025

Date: 27th October, 2025

Counsel For  Petitioner: Yatharth Rohila

Counsel For Respondent: Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel

Read More: Residential Leases Used Exclusively For Residence Are Exempt From GST: Delhi HC

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 5+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies like LiveLaw & Taxscan.