Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTFinance Bill 2025 Proposes GST Amendment: Pre-deposit In E-way bill Appeals Reduced...

Finance Bill 2025 Proposes GST Amendment: Pre-deposit In E-way bill Appeals Reduced From 25% To 10%

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Finance Bill 2025 has proposed the GST Amendment in Section 107 of the GST Act. 

In section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Act, in sub-section (6), for the proviso, the following proviso shall be substituted, namely:

“Provided that in case of any order demanding a penalty without involving demand of any tax, no appeal shall be filed against such order unless a sum equal to ten per cent. of the said penalty has been paid by the appellant.”

Section 107(6) is being amended to provide for 10% mandatory pre- deposit of penalty amount for appeals before Appellate Authority in cases involving only demand of penalty without any demand for tax.

Previously, businesses facing penalty-only cases had to deposit higher amounts to file appeals. With this amendment, the financial burden is reduced, making legal recourse more accessible.

Since no tax demand is involved, reducing the pre-deposit requirement to 10% of the penalty ensures that businesses do not face excessive liquidity constraints while appealing.

By capping the pre-deposit, the amendment prevents excessive financial deterrents from discouraging genuine appeals against wrongful penalties.

Many businesses delay appeals due to high financial costs. A lower pre-deposit could speed up dispute resolution and reduce the backlog in appellate authorities.

By streamlining the appeals process, the amendment promotes a business-friendly environment, reassuring taxpayers of a fair and efficient redressal mechanism.

Official Copy Of Budget Documents

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No GST on Assignment of GIDC Leasehold Rights: Gujarat High Court Orders Refund of ITC Reversal With Interest

The Gujarat High Court has held that the assignment of leasehold rights in an...

NCLT Can’t Involve ED or CBI in Company Investigation Without Hearing Affected Parties: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the National Company Law...

Personal Customs Penalty Proceedings Against Company Director Abate After His Death: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has declared that customs penalty proceedings initiated against a company...

GST Order Passed Without Hearing Quashed: Madras High Court 

The Madras High Court has set aside a GST assessment order passed under Section...

More like this

No GST on Assignment of GIDC Leasehold Rights: Gujarat High Court Orders Refund of ITC Reversal With Interest

The Gujarat High Court has held that the assignment of leasehold rights in an...

NCLT Can’t Involve ED or CBI in Company Investigation Without Hearing Affected Parties: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the National Company Law...

Personal Customs Penalty Proceedings Against Company Director Abate After His Death: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has declared that customs penalty proceedings initiated against a company...