Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTFake GST ITC | Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted As Chargesheet Already Filed:...

Fake GST ITC | Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted As Chargesheet Already Filed: Jharkhand HC Grants Anticipatory Bail

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Jharkhand High Court has granted anticipatory bail to Raaj Jaiswal, a Jamshedpur-based businessman, in connection with a case involving allegations of large-scale fake GST billing and fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims.

The bench of Justice Ananda Sen passed the order observing that custodial interrogation was not necessary in light of the investigation already being complete and the chargesheet (prosecution report) having been filed.

The Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), Jamshedpur unit, had accused Jaiswal of orchestrating a network of bogus firms created in the names of his employees to generate fake invoices and pass on ineligible ITC, allegedly causing a substantial loss to the exchequer. The case is registered under Section 132(1)(i) of the CGST Act and various provisions of the Indian Penal Code, including sections relating to criminal conspiracy, cheating, forgery, and criminal breach of trust.

While acknowledging the seriousness of the alleged offences, the Court noted that the petitioner was never arrested during the investigation, nor was any warrant sought against him. The DGGI also informed the court that there was no apprehension of evidence tampering by the accused.

The Court allowed the anticipatory bail, directing Jaiswal to surrender before the Trial Court within four weeks and furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, including one close relative and one resident of Jharkhand with adequate landed property.

The Court directed that the trial court frame charges expeditiously without unnecessary delays.

The order cited the grant of regular bail to a co-accused in the same matter by a coordinate bench, reinforcing parity in judicial discretion.

Case Details

Case Title: Raaj Jaiswal Versus DGGI

Case No.: A.B.A. No. 8095 of 2024

Date:  18.07.2025

Counsel For  Applicant: Nitin Kr. Pasari, Advocate

Counsel For Respondent:  P.A.S Pati, Advocate

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

DGFT To Launch Central Processing Dept. for Faceless, Jurisdiction-Free Trade Applications By 2 October 2026

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) is establishing a Central Processing Department (CPD)...

Undisclosed Receipts in ST-3 Return Justify Extended Service Tax Demand: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has upheld a service tax...

Importer’s Consent to Enhanced Customs Value Doesn’t Bar Appeal; Valuation Must Follow Statutory Procedure: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad Bench, has held that...

Adjudicating Authority Ignored Remand Directions, Reissued ‘Copy-Paste’ Order: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand 

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

DGFT To Launch Central Processing Dept. for Faceless, Jurisdiction-Free Trade Applications By 2 October 2026

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) is establishing a Central Processing Department (CPD)...

Undisclosed Receipts in ST-3 Return Justify Extended Service Tax Demand: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has upheld a service tax...

Importer’s Consent to Enhanced Customs Value Doesn’t Bar Appeal; Valuation Must Follow Statutory Procedure: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad Bench, has held that...