Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTFADA Approaches Supreme Court Over Rs. 2,500 Crore Compensation Cess Loss After...

FADA Approaches Supreme Court Over Rs. 2,500 Crore Compensation Cess Loss After GST 2.0 Rollout

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Federation of Automobile Dealers Association (FADA) has moved the Supreme Court after facing losses estimated at over ₹2,500 crore due to the lapse of accumulated compensation cess following the rollout of the new GST 2.0 regime on September 22, 2025.

The dealers’ body has argued that automobile dealers across India are left holding large stocks of vehicles purchased before the GST 2.0 transition, on which compensation cess had already been paid. With the cessation of the cess under the new tax structure, these credits have become unusable, effectively turning into sunk costs for the sector.

Dealers seek refund or adjustment relief

In its plea, FADA intends to request that the unutilised compensation cess balances, as reflected in dealers’ ledgers as of September 21, 2025, be permitted for adjustment against regular GST liabilities or alternatively refunded.

Despite repeated representations to senior government officials and Cabinet ministers, no relief has been announced. According to sources in the Union Finance Ministry, the government has decided against extending any relief or transitional provisions to dealers in respect of the lapsed compensation cess.

Earlier, the association had urged the Finance Ministry to transfer the balance amount in the compensation cess credit ledger to the IGST or CGST ledger by September 21 to prevent the loss. However, this request was not accepted.

“Industry facing huge financial strain,” says FADA

“We are thankful for the introduction of GST 2.0, which has revived consumer sentiment and boosted demand for passenger cars, especially in the entry-level segment. But the inventory currently held by dealers carries compensation cess paid under the old regime. Despite our discussions with government authorities, there has been no positive signal. The financial impact is severe and unrecoverable, compelling us to seek judicial intervention,” said Sachin Vasantrao Mahajan, Chairperson of FADA Maharashtra, in a statement to businessline.

He added that the accumulated loss could erase the profit margins of several dealerships for the entire financial year, particularly for smaller players operating on thin margins.

GST 2.0 brings rate cuts, but dealers bear transition cost

As part of the GST 2.0 reforms, the GST Council reduced tax rates on passenger cars measuring up to four metres in length and equipped with engines up to 1,200cc from 28% to 18%, while simultaneously abolishing the compensation cess applicable to these vehicles. The move has made cars more affordable and spurred demand, but the transition has created a fiscal mismatch for dealers holding pre-reform stock.

Dealers escalate issue to top leadership

In addition to the planned Supreme Court petition, FADA has written to the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister, seeking immediate intervention to prevent financial distress across the dealership network. Internal meetings within the association have highlighted growing frustration among members over the government’s inaction.

A senior FADA member, requesting anonymity, said, “We have met all relevant officials in the Union Ministry, but there is no indication of relief. The issue has become critical for dealers nationwide, and approaching the Supreme Court appears to be the only recourse left.”

Past legal interventions

This would not be FADA’s first legal confrontation with the government. The association had previously approached the Supreme Court seeking permission for the sale of BS-III vehicles and later filed another plea seeking an extension for the sale and registration of BS-IV vehicles when emission standards changed.

With the stakes now running into thousands of crores, the association’s impending petition could become a key test case for the treatment of transitional tax liabilities under India’s evolving GST regime.

Case Details

Case Title: FEDERATION OF AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION Versus UOI

Case No.: 60671/2025 Filed on 17-10-2025

Read More: Duty-Free Import Fraud Case: Gujarat HC Dismisses Plea to Quash CBI Charges Against Former SEZ Officers 

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

RP Extinguishing Pre-CIRP MVAT Dues Bars Tax Recovery: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Rs. 20.02 Lakh Pre-Deposit

The Bombay High Court has held that once a resolution plan is approved by...

Statutory Return Periodicity Can’t Be Altered by Tax Dept: Bombay HC Quashes Rs. 1.27 Crore MVAT Interest Demand Against Microsoft

The Bombay High Court has set aside the levy of substantial interest under Section...

Bombay High Court Remands ITAT Matter Over Failure to Consider Paper Book Filed With Rule 29 Affidavit

The Bombay High Court has partly set aside an order of the Income Tax...

Rs. 76.72 Lakh Demand Quashed After Adjudicating Authority Ignored CESTAT Order Upholding Refund: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has set aside a demand of ₹76,72,000 raised against a...

More like this

RP Extinguishing Pre-CIRP MVAT Dues Bars Tax Recovery: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Rs. 20.02 Lakh Pre-Deposit

The Bombay High Court has held that once a resolution plan is approved by...

Statutory Return Periodicity Can’t Be Altered by Tax Dept: Bombay HC Quashes Rs. 1.27 Crore MVAT Interest Demand Against Microsoft

The Bombay High Court has set aside the levy of substantial interest under Section...

Bombay High Court Remands ITAT Matter Over Failure to Consider Paper Book Filed With Rule 29 Affidavit

The Bombay High Court has partly set aside an order of the Income Tax...