HomeGSTEndorsement Requirement Can’t Apply Retrospectively: Karnataka HC Quashes GST Demand Based on...

Endorsement Requirement Can’t Apply Retrospectively: Karnataka HC Quashes GST Demand Based on Prospective SEZ Rules

17/12/2025

135

The Karnataka High Court has quashed a Goods and Service Tax (GST) demand raised for the period July 2017 to March 2018, holding that amended Special Economic Zone(SEZ) Rules and a subsequent circular cannot be applied retrospectively. The tax authorities acted without jurisdiction by relying on requirements that came into force after the relevant tax…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Tags
Endorsement Requirement

Composite GST SCN Against Godown Construction Firm Quashed: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Agent Can’t Be Taxed For Services Of Principal: Delhi High Court Quashes Rs. 45.36 Cr GST Demand On NBCC

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 5+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies like LiveLaw & Taxscan.

Most Popular

Endorsement Requirement Can’t Apply Retrospectively: Karnataka HC Quashes GST Demand Based on Prospective SEZ Rules

Membership Required

Most Popular

GSTAT Revokes Staggered Filing Protocol for Appeals U/s 112

Garnet Exports Are Regulated Irrespective of Inland or Beach Origin, Upholds Confiscation and Penalties: CESTAT

Customs Duty Demand, Penalties Imposed In Alleged Undervaluation And Misdeclaration Of Imported Automobile Parts Case Quashed: CESTAT

Undervaluation, Misdeclaration Allegations Solely Based On Extrapolation From Different Import Transaction Not Sustainable: CESTAT

GSTAT Revokes Staggered Filing Protocol for Appeals U/s 112

Garnet Exports Are Regulated Irrespective of Inland or Beach Origin, Upholds Confiscation and Penalties: CESTAT

Customs Duty Demand, Penalties Imposed In Alleged Undervaluation And Misdeclaration Of Imported Automobile Parts Case Quashed: CESTAT

Endorsement Requirement Can’t Apply Retrospectively: Karnataka HC Quashes GST Demand Based on Prospective SEZ Rules

Membership Required

RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular