Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTCut Tobacco Not ‘Manufactured Chewing Tobacco’, Not Covered Under Higher Tax Category:...

Cut Tobacco Not ‘Manufactured Chewing Tobacco’, Not Covered Under Higher Tax Category: Madras HC 

GST

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Cut Tobacco Not ‘Manufactured Chewing Tobacco’, Not Covered Under Higher Tax Category: Madras HC

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madras High Court has held that cut tobacco produced through minimal processing would not automatically qualify as “manufactured chewing tobacco,” setting aside advance ruling orders that had classified the product under a higher tax category. The Division Bench comprising Justice G.R. Swaminathan and Justice K. Rajasekar allowed a writ appeal filed by a tobacco…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

Railway Printing Press’ In-House Stationery Not Liable to Central Excise Duty as Dept. Fails to Establish Marketability: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai Bench, has set aside...
Indirect Taxes

Organic Manure Made from Sugar Industry By-Products Outside CENVAT Rule 6: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 1.96 Crore Demand

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
Indirect Taxes

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 42.78 Lakh Service Tax Demand on Reimbursement of Shared Expenses

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata has set aside a...
Indirect Taxes

Transfer of Imported Windmill Parts Before Erection Doesn’t Breach Customs Exemption Conditions: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai, has held that transfer...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

Railway Printing Press’ In-House Stationery Not Liable to Central Excise Duty as Dept. Fails to Establish Marketability: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai Bench, has set aside...
Indirect Taxes

Organic Manure Made from Sugar Industry By-Products Outside CENVAT Rule 6: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 1.96 Crore Demand

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
Indirect Taxes

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 42.78 Lakh Service Tax Demand on Reimbursement of Shared Expenses

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata has set aside a...