Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxCBI Apprehends Income Tax Superintendent In Bhadrak, Odisha In A Bribery Case

CBI Apprehends Income Tax Superintendent In Bhadrak, Odisha In A Bribery Case

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has apprehended Office Superintendent, Income Tax Office, Bhadrak, Odisha, in a bribery case.

The instant case was registered by CBI on 03.06.2026 against the Office Superintendent, Income Tax Office, Bhadrak on the basis of a complaint. It was alleged that the accused Office Superintendent demanded a bribe of Rs.5,000 from the complainant for deleting his duplicate PAN card.

The CBI laid a trap and the accused Office Superintendent was caught red-handed while accepting the bribe amount of Rs. 4,000 from the complainant.

The aforesaid accused person has been apprehended.

Further investigation is underway.

Read More: India Extends Countervailing Duty on Malaysian Solar Glass for 5 More Years to Protect Domestic Industry

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...

More like this

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...